2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2013.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does lecture attendance affect academic performance? Panel data evidence for introductory macroeconomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Once time-invariant unobservable heterogeneity is controlled for by first differencing, lecture attendance does not have a significant impact on student performance. This finding (at odds with most of the findings in the attendance literature, 4 although similar to the results provided by Martins and Walker (2006) and Andrietti (2014)) is consistent with a view shared by most instructors: better students attend lectures more frequently on average, and because of their inherent ability/motivation, they also receive higher grades. By contrast, our finding that once endogeneity is accounted for, study time has a substantially higher positive impact on performance, is consistent with the findings of Stinebrickner and Stinebrickner (2008) and Bonesrønning and Opstad (2012), suggesting that study time may be considered an important causal determinant of academic performance whose impact may be seriously underestimated in OLS-proxy regressions.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once time-invariant unobservable heterogeneity is controlled for by first differencing, lecture attendance does not have a significant impact on student performance. This finding (at odds with most of the findings in the attendance literature, 4 although similar to the results provided by Martins and Walker (2006) and Andrietti (2014)) is consistent with a view shared by most instructors: better students attend lectures more frequently on average, and because of their inherent ability/motivation, they also receive higher grades. By contrast, our finding that once endogeneity is accounted for, study time has a substantially higher positive impact on performance, is consistent with the findings of Stinebrickner and Stinebrickner (2008) and Bonesrønning and Opstad (2012), suggesting that study time may be considered an important causal determinant of academic performance whose impact may be seriously underestimated in OLS-proxy regressions.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…By contrast, panel data studies that exploit within-student between-midterm/subject variation provide mixed results. Whereas Cohn and Johnson (2006) and Stanca (2006), among others, found a positive and significant effect of attendance, Arulampalam, Naylor, and Smith (2012) found such an effect only for high-performing students, and Martins and Walker (2006) and Andrietti (2014) found no effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Recent analyses by Andrietti (2014) and Mearman, Pacheco, Webber, Ivlevs and Rahman (2014) provided thorough reviews of the existing literature exploring the relationship between college class www.ccsenet.org/hes…”
Section: Class Attendancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…El uso de esta plataforma permitirá automatizar estas tareas y permitirá que ese tiempo pueda ser empleado de otras actividades. Finalmente, para ambos casos los datos podrán además ser analizados y obtener patrones de asistencia a clase dependiendo de distintos factores (fechas, horarios, cercanía a los periodos de exámenes,...) que podrán ser usados para mejorar los procesos educativos y estudiar la correlación existente entre la asistencia a clase y el rendimiento académico tal y como se ha hecho previamente (Andrietti, 2014;Andrietti & Velasco, 2015;Grabe & Christopherson, 2008).…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified