Does marital status matter in an HIV hyperendemic country? Findings from the 2012 South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour Survey

Abstract

Recently, South Africa has experienced declining marriage rates and the increasing practice of cohabitation without marriage. This study aims to improve the understanding of the relationship between marital status and HIV in South Africa, an HIV hyperendemic country, through an analysis of findings from the 2012 South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour Survey. The nationally representative population-based cross-sectional survey collected data on HIV and socio-demographic and behavioural determinants in South Africa. This analysis considered respondents aged 16 years and older who consented to participate in the survey and provided dried blood spot specimens for HIV testing (N=17,356). After controlling for age, race, having multiple sexual partners, condom use at last sex, urban/rural dwelling and level of household income, those who were married living with their spouse had significantly reduced odds of being HIV positive compared to all other marital status groups. HIV incidence was 0.27% among respondents who were married living with their spouses; the highest HIV incidence was found in the cohabiting group (2.91%). Later marriage (after age 24) was associated with increased odds of HIV prevalence. Our analysis suggests an association between marital status and HIV prevalence and incidence in contemporary South Africa, where odds of being HIV positive were found to be lower among married individuals who lived with their spouse compared to all other marital status groups. HIV prevention messages therefore need to be targeted to unmarried populations, especially cohabitating populations. As low socioeconomic status, low social cohesion and the resulting destabilization of sexual relationships may explain the increased risk of HIV among unmarried populations, it is necessary to address structural issues including poverty that create an environment unfavourable to stable sexual relationships.

Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging in South African manganese mine workers

“…It is possible the increased T1 intensity indices may be from one of these other sources of T1 signal change; however, there has been no evidence of blood, melanin, or lipid accumulating lesions in Mn neurotoxicity. HIV infection is a potential concern in these mine workers as the prevalence of HIV is high in South Africa 40 , but there were no HIV pathologies identified in this cohort. Olanow et al 14 documented no difference in tissue Mn in their Mn-exposed animals but noted aluminum and Fe accumulation in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars reticularis.…”

Peak HIV prevalence: a useful outcome variable for ecological studies

“…We limited our analysis to the 13,884 individuals aged 15 to 55 years old who agreed to HIV testing. For more detailed information about the survey methodology see Shisana et al[39, 40]…”

“…Because comparable cross-country estimates of circular migration do not exist[27], in the second part of the study, we examine the relationship between circular migration and HIV in both South Africa’s nine provinces and ethnic groups. Adult HIV prevalence varies by up to a factor of five between South Africa’s provinces and a factor of 40 between its ethnic groups[28]. High migration intensity is one of the factors that have been put forward to explain differential HIV spread in the country[23].…”

Cultural Conundrums: The Ethics of Epidemiology and the Problems of Population in Implementing Pre‐Exposure Prophylaxis

“…Notwithstanding, it is interesting to note that the figure more closely resembles the national HIV prevalence estimate of 32.7% among black, anatomically female women, aged 20-34, than it does the national HIV prevalence estimate of 9.9% among a heterogeneous category, with respect to both age and race, of MSM. 66 The similarity between the prevalence figures of black gay men and black women is striking, especially given the preponderance of ethnographic as well as cultural knowledge that troubles any homogenous epidemiological coding of MSM. The comparability of these figures is admittedly spurious, and I would not suggest making any conclusions about the shape of the HIV epidemic in South Africa based on such a comparison.…”