2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00925.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Mate Limitation in Self-Incompatible Species Promote the Evolution of Selfing? The Case of Leavenworthia Alabamica

Abstract: Genetic diversity at the S-locus controlling self-incompatibility (SI) is often high because of negative frequency-dependent selection.In species with highly patchy spatial distributions, genetic drift can overwhelm balancing selection and cause stochastic loss of Salleles. Natural selection may favor the breakdown of SI in populations with few S-alleles because low S-allele diversity constrains the seed production of self-incompatible plants. We estimated S-allele diversity, effective population sizes, and mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The partially selfing a2 population is fixed for an S-allele (purple dots) which is also found at a low frequency in a geographically close SI population. Phenotypic characterization of the S-alleles in selfing populations suggests that they both disrupt the pollen component of SI (Busch et al 2011) outcrossing floral morphology, yet self-fertilizes substantially (s m = 0.523), such that appreciable levels of selfing do not require floral adaptations typically found in selfing populations (Busch et al 2010b). Examination of the genetic basis of SC has revealed that both of the S-alleles found in the selfing populations of L. alabamica have a dysfunctional pollen component of SI, suggesting mutations in the SCR gene, as would be expected in theory (Uyenoyama et al 2001).…”
Section: The Genetic Basis Of Transitions From Si To Scmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The partially selfing a2 population is fixed for an S-allele (purple dots) which is also found at a low frequency in a geographically close SI population. Phenotypic characterization of the S-alleles in selfing populations suggests that they both disrupt the pollen component of SI (Busch et al 2011) outcrossing floral morphology, yet self-fertilizes substantially (s m = 0.523), such that appreciable levels of selfing do not require floral adaptations typically found in selfing populations (Busch et al 2010b). Examination of the genetic basis of SC has revealed that both of the S-alleles found in the selfing populations of L. alabamica have a dysfunctional pollen component of SI, suggesting mutations in the SCR gene, as would be expected in theory (Uyenoyama et al 2001).…”
Section: The Genetic Basis Of Transitions From Si To Scmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent work has made progress on understanding how and why this evolutionary transition occurred in L. alabamica (Busch et al 2010b(Busch et al , 2011. This species has co-occurring SI and SC populations, and an S-linked marker permits the study of S-alleles (Busch et al 2008;Fig.…”
Section: The Genetic Basis Of Transitions From Si To Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One hypothesis for the labile nature of SI is that the transition from outcrossing to selfing can provide a selective advantage at a given time and place (Stebbins, 1957;Busch et al, 2010;Goldberg et al, 2010;Wright and Barrett, 2010). A single inactivated S-locus haplotype was fixed in C. rubella, representing the key step in the recent transition to selfing for this species (Guo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Relationship Between the S Locus And Selfingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population inbreeding coefficients (F IS ) for all populations of H. carnosus or P. tenuifolius were either not significantly different from zero or significantly lower than zero, indicating that there was less inbreeding than expected (Table 1). This lack of inbreeding may be due to the combination of sporophytic self-incompatibility with generally small population sizes in these species, where limited numbers of S-alleles skew successful matings strongly toward pairings of the least related individuals (Busch et al 2010;Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1987). This may have long-term Unlike the narrow endemics, four populations of H. radula had inbreeding coefficients significantly higher than zero, indicating higher levels of inbreeding than expected, and both the species grand mean and pooled species-level inbreeding coefficients were also significantly higher than (Table 1).…”
Section: Genetic Factors and Narrow Endemismmentioning
confidence: 97%