2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does mixing tree species enhance stand resistance against natural hazards? A case study for spruce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regional studies conducted in several countries, with the aim of predicting which forests would be more suitable for future conditions, have come up with similar recommendations concerning reductions in spruce monocultures, and giving preference to mixed forests with a higher proportion of deciduous tree species, particularly the European beech [44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional studies conducted in several countries, with the aim of predicting which forests would be more suitable for future conditions, have come up with similar recommendations concerning reductions in spruce monocultures, and giving preference to mixed forests with a higher proportion of deciduous tree species, particularly the European beech [44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, for example, König (1996) and von Lüpke and Spellmann (1999) did not find a positive effect of tree mixture on stand resistance in the case of Norway spruce and European beech and concluded that stand type is not as important as soil type. Schütz et al (2006) and Griess et al (2012) reported evidence of European beech stabilizing admixed Norway spruce in mixed stands. This finding was considered for SMI r of mixed stands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the risk of the mixed stand is defined by the risk of the main stand, because a failing of admixed species does not affect total stand survival. Moreover, the specific risk of the admixed species may even decrease (Griess et al 2012). However, when species comprising a lower risk are admixed to a main stand, then the risk of stand loss of the mixed stand will be reduced proportionally, since admixed species should not be affected by calamities in the same extent as the main stand.…”
Section: Risk Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, mono-specific plantations of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst), one of the most commercially valuable tree species in Europe, are declining (Jonard et al 2012;Bošel'a et al 2014). However, the survival of Norway spruce can be increased when growing in mixed-forest (Griess et al 2012). The introduction of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) into coniferous mono-specific stands plays a central role in current forest transition strategies (Geßler et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%