2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-006-9057-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does “No” mean “No”? A protest methodology

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a method of identifying and truncating protesters in Contingent Valuation surveys. We propose using a system of Willingness to Pay (WTP) questions that value multiple goods and that use both discrete choice and open-ended questions coupled with multiple questions about protest beliefs administered to the entire sample. Protesters can then be identified because they reject all bids, declare zero on all open-ended questions, and hold protest beliefs. The proposed procedure has been empi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
50
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the level of negative answers (54.4%) was high when compared to other studies in Brazil; Gullo (2010), for example, obtained 34.8% of negative answers for the preservation of a dam, and in the study of Silva and Lima (2004) on the preservation of the Chico Mendes Park, in Rio Branco, 32% of the responses were "zero". Similar results were reported by Saz-Salazar and Guaita-Pradas (2013), which had 52% of "zero" answers and by the study of Dziegielewska and Mendelshon (2007), in which more than 65% of the answers were "zero".…”
Section: Regression Logit With the Protest Responses (N=180)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, the level of negative answers (54.4%) was high when compared to other studies in Brazil; Gullo (2010), for example, obtained 34.8% of negative answers for the preservation of a dam, and in the study of Silva and Lima (2004) on the preservation of the Chico Mendes Park, in Rio Branco, 32% of the responses were "zero". Similar results were reported by Saz-Salazar and Guaita-Pradas (2013), which had 52% of "zero" answers and by the study of Dziegielewska and Mendelshon (2007), in which more than 65% of the answers were "zero".…”
Section: Regression Logit With the Protest Responses (N=180)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Protest bidders are respondents who may actually place some value on the commodity in question but refuse to pay on the basis on ethical or other reasons. Protest voters should be excluded during analysis of CVM data because they can bias estimations of central tendency measures of WTP [60]. Protesters were identified as respondents who declared zero on all valuation questions, and held at least one effective protest belief.…”
Section: Methodology Of the Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following common practice in the CV literature (e.g. Strazzera et al, 2003;Dziegielewska and Mendelsohn, 2007), these protest responses were omitted from further analysis, while the true zero votes were kept in 1 . This yields a total of 1,315 useable responses.…”
Section: Mean Wtp Across Value and Preference Uncertainty Elicitationmentioning
confidence: 99%