2002
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does node stability underlie the verbal transformation effect? A test of node structure theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, participants experiencing the transformed percept ''bike'' for ''spike'' report hearing a burst of noise as a separate auditory stream and if provided with a speech editor can generate the same 'bike' percept by removing the frication noise from ''spike'' . While changes in grouping can occur for nonspeech sequences (Carlyon et al, 2001), research has shown that the frequency of verbal transformations depends on linguistic as well as physical properties of speech since real words like ''spike'' return to their veridical percept more frequently than nonwords like ''spipe' ' (MacKay et al, 1993;Shoaf and Pitt, 2002). Thus evidence from migrations and verbal transformations indicate that language-specific knowledge of words influences the way in which speech sounds are grouped together in perception.…”
Section: Perceptual Grouping Of Speechmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For instance, participants experiencing the transformed percept ''bike'' for ''spike'' report hearing a burst of noise as a separate auditory stream and if provided with a speech editor can generate the same 'bike' percept by removing the frication noise from ''spike'' . While changes in grouping can occur for nonspeech sequences (Carlyon et al, 2001), research has shown that the frequency of verbal transformations depends on linguistic as well as physical properties of speech since real words like ''spike'' return to their veridical percept more frequently than nonwords like ''spipe' ' (MacKay et al, 1993;Shoaf and Pitt, 2002). Thus evidence from migrations and verbal transformations indicate that language-specific knowledge of words influences the way in which speech sounds are grouped together in perception.…”
Section: Perceptual Grouping Of Speechmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As a consequence of the amount of lexical priming, high frequency words should be more stable than low frequency words. Similarly, less stability has been observed for pseudowords than words, which have strong and well-formed representations, and for phonologically illegal pseudowords than for permissible pseudowords (Natsoulas, 1965;Shoaf and Pitt, 2002). In addition, it has been shown that the proportion of nonword transformations also varied with the lexical status of the repeated stimulus, with words producing the fewest transformations .…”
Section: Hal-00194046 Version 1 -5 Dec 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, Sato, Schwartz, Abry, Cathiard, and Loevenbruck (2006) Yin and Abrams, 1993;Shoaf and Pitt, 2002), and considering the general preference for L a VC o V sequences in French lexicons according to syllabic inventories (Rousset, 2004), various stimuli were selected in order to hal-00194046, version 1 -5 Dec 2007…”
Section: A Possible Perceptual Correlate Of the Labial-coronal Chunkimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13]). They can be tentatively separated into primitive-and schema-based transformations based on Bregman's classification scheme for auditory scene analysis.…”
Section: Auditory Bases Of the Verbal Transformation Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%