2016
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does objectively measured daily duration of forward bending predict development and aggravation of low-back pain? A prospective study

Abstract: This study is the first to investigate the association between objectively measured duration of forward bending and the prospective development and aggravation of low-back pain among blue-collar workers. This study shows no significant association. Future studies in the cohort will investigate the contribution of possible effect modifiers such as psychosocial work factors and physical capacity.Affiliation:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, workers were asked to state their intensity of LBP every fourth week from baseline to one-year follow-up via text messages, thus a total of 14 text messages were sent (34).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, workers were asked to state their intensity of LBP every fourth week from baseline to one-year follow-up via text messages, thus a total of 14 text messages were sent (34).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…com), resulting in a total of 14 text messages sent (34). The text messages asked "On a scale of 0-10, grade the worst pain you have experienced in your lower back within the past month?"…”
Section: Assessment Of Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vineyard-workers were asked to rate their pain intensity using a 0–10 numeric rating scale (0:”No pain”, 10: “Worst imaginable pain”) [25,31] every working day over the 2 weeks prior data collection. The mean of these ratings was used for data analysis enabling to assess the relationship between trunk kinematics and the pain intensity representing a proxy of the pain commonly reported in the low back region by the participants from the Chateau Larose-Trintaudon (France).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it did not assess the association between physical exposure and risk of LBP among vineyard-workers, while numerous studies have highlighted the need to evaluate more precisely this association using objective and quantitative field measurements [16,29,30]. As mentioned in numerous studies [31,32], one valid approach to quantify the risk of LBP among workers is to assess the relationship between duration of forward bending and self-reported LBP intensity, e.g. using numeric pain rating scale (NRS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological development has made it possible to obtain field measurements with surface electromyography (sEMG) [10,11], kinematics measured with inertial measurement unit (IMU) [12][13][14][15], or a combination [16]. However, no studies have used sEMG, IMU and video recordings obtained simultaneously to detect events with excessive physical workload (events) during a working day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%