Does Parenting Influence the Enduring Impact of Severe Childhood Sexual Abuse on Psychiatric Resilience in Adulthood?

Lind, Mackenzie J.; Brown, Ruth C.; Sheerin, Christina M.; York, Timothy P.; Myers, John; Kendler, Kenneth S.; Amstadter, Ananda B.

doi:10.1007/s10578-017-0727-y

Cited by 32 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As expected from the results of previous studies showing that early experiences in childhood affect personality traits (6,8,9,20,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51), parental care in childhood increased resilience and parental overprotection decreased it in this study. Consistent with our results, Lind et al reported the same findings, and also demonstrated that the interaction of childhood sexual abuse with high parental authoritarianism affected resilience (17). Our results replicated the results of Lind et al and further demonstrated that resilience mediated the effect of perceived parental bonding on work stress.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Childhood adversity ( 16 ) and parenting styles, such as care, overprotection, or abuse in childhood influence resilience. Parental warmth was associated with increased resilience, whereas parental protectiveness was associated with decreased resilience, and there was a statistically significant interaction between severe childhood sexual abuse and parental authoritarianism, such that individuals with a childhood sexual abuse history and higher authoritarianism scores had lower resilience ( 17 ). Self-esteem, which is an important factor of resilience ( 18 , 19 ), is enhanced by care parenting and is reduced by abuse or overprotection ( 20 – 22 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Combined Effects of Parenting in Childhood and Resilience on Work Stress in Nonclinical Adult Workers From the Community

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Stress responses induced by job stressors are modified by individual factors. Perceived parental bonding and resilience would play important roles as such individual factors. In this study, we analyzed the mediating roles of resilience on parenting, job stressors, and stress responses among adult workers from the community. Methods: A total of 528 workers participated in this study after providing written consent, and completed questionnaires on demographic data, as well as Parental Bonding Instrument, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. Associations between perceived parental bonding, resilience, perceived job stressors, and the psychological and physical stress response (PPSR) were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results: Structural equation modeling with covariance structure analysis showed that parental overprotection reduced resilience and increased perceived job stressors and PPSR. Resilience and perceived job stressors and their combination mediated the effect of parental overprotection on PPSR. Resilience mediated the effect of parental overprotection on perceived job stressors. Perceived job stressors mediated the effect of resilience on PPSR. Parental care had opposite effects to parental overprotection, but the difference was small. Conclusion: In this study, we showed that perceived parental bonding affects resilience, and that both factors affect the stress response and perceived job stressors. These findings suggest that parental bonding and resilience are major individual factors affecting work stress, and should be noted when considering industrial hygiene measures for individual workers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combined Effects of Parenting in Childhood and Resilience on Work Stress in Nonclinical Adult Workers From the Community

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many studies also employed the Child Behavior Checklist to capture behavior problems including aggression (Holmes et al, 2015), externalizing symptoms (Yoon, 2018), and overall symptomology (Williams & Nelson-Gardell, 2012). Measures of internalizing symptomology were also common and included the Beck Depression Inventory (Lumley & McArthur, 2016) and the Symptom Checklist-90 (Lind et al, 2018).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience Following Child Maltreatment: Definitional Considerations and Developmental Variations

Yoon

Howell

Dillard

et al. 2019

Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resilience following childhood maltreatment has received substantial empirical attention, with the number of studies on this construct growing exponentially in the past decade. While there is ample interest, inconsistencies remain about how to conceptualize and assess resilience. Further, there is a lack of consensus on how developmental stage influences resilience and how protective factors affect its expression. The current systematic review uses a developmental lens to synthesize findings on resilience following child maltreatment. Specifically, this article consolidates the body of empirical literature in a developmentally oriented review, with the intention of inclusively assessing three key areas—the conceptualization of resilience, assessment of resilience, and factors associated with resilience in maltreatment research. A total of 67 peer-reviewed, quantitative empirical articles that examined child maltreatment and resilience were included in this review. Results indicate that some inconsistencies in the literature may be addressed by utilizing a developmental lens and considering the individual’s life stage when selecting a definition of resilience and associated measurement tool. The findings also support developmental variations in factors associated with resilience, with different individual, relational, and community protective factors emerging based on life stage. Implications for practice, policy, and research are incorporated throughout this review.

show abstract

“…Participants for the current study were taken from the Virginia Adult Twin Studies of Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders (VATSPSUD; total N ∼ 7500), a large longitudinal twin study of Caucasian adults, described in detail elsewhere (Kendler & Prescott, ). Similar to existing papers with this data set (e.g., Kendler et al., ; Lind et al., ; Lind, Aggen, Kendler, York, & Amstadter, ), this sample is being used as an epidemiological sample, with analyses controlling for twin status. We utilized data from female–female (FF) and male–male and male–female (MMMF) twins assessed at two separate interview waves (referred to here as Time 1 [study wave 1 for FF and MMMF] and Time 2 [study wave 3 for FF and wave 2 for MMMF]).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of resilience and subsequent stressful life events on MDD and GAD

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background There remains a dearth of research examining the “buffering” effect of resilience, wherein resilience at one point in time would be expected to protect an individual against development of psychopathology following future adverse life events. Methods Using longitudinal data from an epidemiological twin sample (N = 7463), this study tested whether resilience would act as a buffer for stressful life events (SLEs) against risk for major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Resilience, demographics, and psychopathology were measured at Time 1 and recent SLEs and current MDD and GAD were measured at Time 2. Results Final models, controlling for demographic covariates and Time 1 diagnosis, examined the impact of Time 1 resilience, recent SLEs, their interaction, and a three-way interaction adding sex, on MDD and GAD. Conclusions The pattern of findings was the same for MDD and GAD, wherein main effects and two-way interactions of resilience and SLEs were significant, such that greater resilience was protective, even in the context of high numbers of past-year SLEs. The three-way interaction was not significant, suggesting that the relationship between SLEs and resilience on psychopathology was the same for both men and women. Findings support the conceptualization of resilience as a buffer against the impact of future life stressors on common internalizing psychopathology. Longitudinal designs and trajectory-based studies that include recurring measures of SLEs could inform conceptualizations of resilience in the context of ongoing adversity and aid in developing interventions aimed at fostering healthy adaptation in the face of stressors.

show abstract

Does Parenting Influence the Enduring Impact of Severe Childhood Sexual Abuse on Psychiatric Resilience in Adulthood?

Cited by 32 publications

References 52 publications

Combined Effects of Parenting in Childhood and Resilience on Work Stress in Nonclinical Adult Workers From the Community

Combined Effects of Parenting in Childhood and Resilience on Work Stress in Nonclinical Adult Workers From the Community

Resilience Following Child Maltreatment: Definitional Considerations and Developmental Variations

The impact of resilience and subsequent stressful life events on MDD and GAD

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About