2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2452482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Performance Matter? Evaluating Political Selection along the Chinese Administrative Ladder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
68
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, we find no evidence for Implication 4 that the central government appoints homegrown party secretaries based on the previous provincial economic performance. The result is consistent with the argument of Landry, Lü, and Duan (Landry et al., ) that the appointment decision of high‐ranking officials such as provincial party secretaries is likely affected by non‐economic factors, because it has substantial implications on the balance of power between factions at the central level.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taken together, we find no evidence for Implication 4 that the central government appoints homegrown party secretaries based on the previous provincial economic performance. The result is consistent with the argument of Landry, Lü, and Duan (Landry et al., ) that the appointment decision of high‐ranking officials such as provincial party secretaries is likely affected by non‐economic factors, because it has substantial implications on the balance of power between factions at the central level.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Landry, Lü, and Duan () propose a theory to reconcile the two dominant views. They argue that lower officials pose no political threat to the top leaders.…”
Section: Political Selection In China: Performance Vs Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another school holds that economic performance increases the likelihood of promotion (Li & Zhou 2005;Landry 2008;Yao 2016). A third contends that economic performance matters more as a factor for promotion at lower levels of government, whereas political connectedness matters more at the central level (Choi 2012;Landry, Lü & Duan 2014). …”
Section: The Party's Role Within the Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposition that economic performance matters more as a factor for promotion at lower levels of government (Choi 2012;Landry, Lü & Duan 2014) may apply to lower level subsidiaries of central SOEs (see column 2). Indeed, this is the only group of companies for which firm profitability and the leader's education credentials are positively and significantly associated with promotion.…”
Section: Performance Versus Political Connections For Promotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result environmental protection remains by and large subordinated to economic policies. In this context, it is reported, that promoting growth and attracting investments have been the most important criteria in responsibility contracts for leading cadres at the sub-provincial level (Edin 2003;Ong 2012;Landry et al 2015). Thus, economic performance represents an important political career factor and at the same time creates the financial means needed for promoting environmental law enforcement.…”
Section: (C) Economic Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%