2011
DOI: 10.1177/0269215511406557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept, in conjunction with a task practice, achieve greater improvement in walking ability in people with stroke compared to physiotherapy focused on structured task practice alone? A pilot randomized controlled trial

Abstract: This pilot study indicates short-term benefit for using interventions based on the Bobath concept for improving walking velocity in people with stroke. A sample size of 32 participants per group is required for a definitive study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
28
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…26 From the other side, a compartmental study of interventions based on the Bobath concept, in conjunction with task practice, and structured task practice alone showed signifi cantly greater walking velocity, but no signifi cant difference in improvement between the 2 groups for the adapted 6-minute walk test and for the Berg Balance Scale. 27 Outcomes of an earlier study by Lennon et al 28 did not support the hypothesis that the Bobath approach restored more normal movement patterns to the gait cycle. Further research is required to investigate the treatment techniques that are effective at improving walking ability in people after stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…26 From the other side, a compartmental study of interventions based on the Bobath concept, in conjunction with task practice, and structured task practice alone showed signifi cantly greater walking velocity, but no signifi cant difference in improvement between the 2 groups for the adapted 6-minute walk test and for the Berg Balance Scale. 27 Outcomes of an earlier study by Lennon et al 28 did not support the hypothesis that the Bobath approach restored more normal movement patterns to the gait cycle. Further research is required to investigate the treatment techniques that are effective at improving walking ability in people after stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Por ejemplo, Brock et al 45 compararon en pacientes en etapa aguda, los efectos a corto plazo del enfoque Bobath adicionando la práctica de actividades cotidianas y el tratamiento con énfasis en tareas funcionales; mientras que Tung, et al 44 compararon en pacientes crónicos los efectos de un enfoque ecléctico y el entrenamiento del paso de sedente a de pie.…”
Section: Resultados De La Búsqueda Bibliográficaunclassified
“…Durante la revisión se encontraron cinco estudios 35,38,41,42,45 que incluyeron dicho enfoque, sin embargo en dos de ellos se comparó su efecto con un programa de reaprendizaje motor 35,41 , uno con el tratamiento ortopédico 42 , uno con un enfoque ecléctico con énfasis en tareas funcionales 45 y otro con un grupo sin tratamiento 38 . En una revisión de Kollen, et al 50 se evaluó la evidencia en 16 ensayos clínicos controlados sobre la eficacia del enfoque Bobath en pacientes post-ECV, comparado con otros enfoques neuromusculares y el tratamiento convencional.…”
Section: Resultados De La Búsqueda Bibliográficaunclassified
“…Further evidence concerning improvement in walking long distances on different surfaces and around obstacles after 3 weeks of NDT-Bobath rehabilitation in post-stroke patients was provided by Benito Garcia et al [1]. On the other hand, the motor relearning program (MRP) was more effective than the NDT-Bobath approach in acute rehabilitation of patients with stroke [2]. Improvement of gait ability in the group of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis treated with the NDT-Bobath method was assessed as similar to outcomes of robot-based therapy [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%