2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-014-9286-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
122
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
122
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, although not dispositive, our results are consistent with other research that finds partisanship can behave like a social identity, “spilling over” into behaviors other than vote choice (e.g., Iyengar, Sood, and Lelkes ; Iyenger and Westwood ; Klofstad, McDermott, and Hatemi ; Mason ). The behavioral patterns we found do not seem to represent mere cheap talk on surveys (e.g., Bullock et al 2013), but are consistent with the view that partisanship can affect ancillary behavior (e.g., Gerber and Huber ; Gift and Gift ). To be sure, our results cannot definitively establish what aspect of partisanship leads Americans to prefer contacting copartisans.…”
Section: Discussion: Preaching To the Choirsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, although not dispositive, our results are consistent with other research that finds partisanship can behave like a social identity, “spilling over” into behaviors other than vote choice (e.g., Iyengar, Sood, and Lelkes ; Iyenger and Westwood ; Klofstad, McDermott, and Hatemi ; Mason ). The behavioral patterns we found do not seem to represent mere cheap talk on surveys (e.g., Bullock et al 2013), but are consistent with the view that partisanship can affect ancillary behavior (e.g., Gerber and Huber ; Gift and Gift ). To be sure, our results cannot definitively establish what aspect of partisanship leads Americans to prefer contacting copartisans.…”
Section: Discussion: Preaching To the Choirsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Along with work showing that the citizens most likely to contact their representatives tend to have the most ideologically orthodox views (Verba, Schlozman, and Brady ), our results highlight how a persistent bias in how citizens express their views could reinforce elite polarization. The findings also add to a growing literature suggesting that partisanship exhibits traits similar to other social identities (e.g., Gift and Gift ; Iyenger and Westwood ).…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…If people harbor negative feelings toward members of the opposite party, then they may perform low‐quality work due to lower motivation. This need not be due to a deliberate attempt at sabotage; rather, it may be an unconscious process of shirking in response to an undesired boss (Gift and Gift )…”
Section: Study 1: Field Experiments In An Online Labor Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, economic games(Carlin & Love, 2018;Iyengar & Westwood, 2015; Tappin & McKay, in press;Westwood, Iyengar, Walgrave, Leonisio, Miller, & Strijbis, 2018), real-life economic decisions (e.g., hiring;Gift & Gift, 2015;McConnell, Margalit, Malhotra, & Levendusky, 2018;Michelitch, 2015), measures of subtle and blatant dehumanization (Casses, in press), and endorsements of partisan violence and terrorism (although absolute rates are relatively low;Kalmoe & Mason, 2019). Evidence for affective polarization has been found in countries outside of North America, including Belgium, the…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%