2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.09.014
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does presence of adenomyosis affect reproductive outcome in IVF cycles? A retrospective analysis of 973 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
100
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
100
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of sonographically detected adenomyosis in this study population of infertile patients is in accordance with the prevalence of 6.9–24.4% reported in other studies 12–15,17,20 . While there are no uniform guidelines regarding US diagnosis of adenomyosis, the selected features reflect those identified by the MUSA consensus group as being associated with adenomyosis 7,21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The prevalence of sonographically detected adenomyosis in this study population of infertile patients is in accordance with the prevalence of 6.9–24.4% reported in other studies 12–15,17,20 . While there are no uniform guidelines regarding US diagnosis of adenomyosis, the selected features reflect those identified by the MUSA consensus group as being associated with adenomyosis 7,21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In particular, compared with women with endometriosis alone, those affected by adenomyosis had a significantly lower clinical pregnancy rate (26.4% versus 12.5%) and live-birth rate (26.4% versus 12.5%). Similar results were reported in women with endometriosis and adenomyosis 71 .…”
Section: Impact On Fertilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For instance, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has been recognized as an endocrine disease related to the increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes [14, 15]. Sharma et al found that the presence of adenomyosis might contribute to the adverse effects on the IVF outcomes in terms of the clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and miscarriage rate [16]. Additionally, Wang LF et al suggested that pre-pregnancy obesity might result in the high prevalence of macrosomia, which increased the mean BW in cohort analysis [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%