2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2005.200385.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Robotic Technology Make Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Too Expensive? A Hospital Cost Analysis of Robotic and Conventional Techniques

Abstract: Robotic technology did not significantly increase hospital cost. While the absolute cost for robotic surgery was higher than conventional techniques after taking into account the institutional cost of the robot, the major driver of cost for robotic procedures will likely continue to decrease, as the surgical team becomes increasingly familiar with robotic technology. Furthermore, other benefits, such as improvement in postoperative quality of life and more expeditious return to work may make a robotic approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When leaving out the initial capital investment for the robotic system, there was no significant difference in costs between the robot procedure and the sternotomy procedure. 141 Most cost analyses have been performed for radical prostatectomy. The cost of the open conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has been compared by different groups.…”
Section: Cost-effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When leaving out the initial capital investment for the robotic system, there was no significant difference in costs between the robot procedure and the sternotomy procedure. 141 Most cost analyses have been performed for radical prostatectomy. The cost of the open conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has been compared by different groups.…”
Section: Cost-effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the crucial question is whether robotic surgery, being more expensive, is better than comparable traditional video-endoscopic and open surgery. Generally most robotic and laparoscopic procedures have less short term morbidity, blood loss, intensive care unit and hospital stay then open surgery (6,11,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). Up to now no major differences have been found between robot-assisted and classic videoassisted procedures for these factors.…”
Section: How Important Are Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean hospital cost, without including capital costs, was comparable (18503 AUD vs 17880 AUD, p=0.176). Morgan and colleagues conducted a retrospective review of clinical and financial data of 20 patients undergoing atrial septal defect closure, and 20 patients who underwent mitral valve repair (MVR) using either robotic techniques or a conventional approach by sternotomy (34). Robotics did not significantly increase the total hospital cost for ASD closure or MVR.…”
Section: Cardiac Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system is very expensive and the robotic surgical instruments have a fixed usage life of 10 procedures per instrument (30). Difficult to assess is the offset of these costs due to shorter ICU and hospital stays.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%