2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does simple feeding enrichment raise activity levels of captive ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta)?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
38
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we suggest that the behavior patterns of the free‐ranging lemurs at Fota Wildlife Park are similar to lemurs in the wild when food is not scarce. We did not observe intra‐group aggression, which can occur when resources are limited in wild populations (Budnitz & Dainis, ; Sauther et al, ), nor did we observe stereotypies sometimes displayed by traditionally caged captive lemurs (Dishman et al, ; Tarou, Bloomsmith, & Maple, ). Additionally, the number of species foraged and the daily foraging pattern observed at Fota Wildlife Park is similar to wild populations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Here, we suggest that the behavior patterns of the free‐ranging lemurs at Fota Wildlife Park are similar to lemurs in the wild when food is not scarce. We did not observe intra‐group aggression, which can occur when resources are limited in wild populations (Budnitz & Dainis, ; Sauther et al, ), nor did we observe stereotypies sometimes displayed by traditionally caged captive lemurs (Dishman et al, ; Tarou, Bloomsmith, & Maple, ). Additionally, the number of species foraged and the daily foraging pattern observed at Fota Wildlife Park is similar to wild populations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Both abiotic (e.g., artificial light, loud noises) and confinement‐specific stressors (e.g.,, proximity to humans, inability to retreat) can lead to immunosuppression, increased stereotypic behavior, and lowered reproductive success (Kanitz, Tuchscherer, Puppe, Tuchscherer, & Stabenow, ; Moore and Jessop, ; Morgan & Tromborg, ; Shyne, ). Captive facilities also put animals at a higher risk for obesity and obesity‐related diseases, as activity levels and diets greatly differ between captive environments and the wild (Britt, ; Dishman, Thomson, & Karnovsky, ; Goodchild & Schwitzer, ; Videan, Fritz, & Murphy, ). In order to reduce the negative impacts caused by captive housing, captive facilities have instilled practices that help promote natural behaviors and increase activity levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental enrichment is a standard tool that has been implemented by zoos, aquariums, and other facilities to address these issues and improve the welfare and well‐being of captive animals (Dishman et al, ; Maloney et al, ; Maple and Perdue, ; Shepherdson, ; Sommerfeld, Bauert, Hillmann, & Stauffacher, ). The purpose of environmental enrichment is to improve the “quality of captive animal care by identifying and providing the environmental stimuli necessary for optimal psychological and physiological well‐being” (Shepherdson, , pp.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enrichment (including structural, olfactory, social, or object enrichment) promotes psychological well-being, physical activity, performance of natural behaviors, and can decrease stress and stereotypical behaviors. Several studies have found that enrichment can positively impact lemurs in captivity (feeding enrichment [Kerridge, 2005;Dishman et al, 2009]). Not all enrichment, however, results in positive behavioral change and this, therefore, requires testing [Shepherdson, 1998;Mehrkam and Dorey, 2015].…”
Section: Captive Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%