More than US$21 billion is spent annually on biodiversity conservation. Despite their importance for preventing or slowing extinctions and preserving biodiversity, conservation interventions are rarely assessed systematically for their global impact. Islands house a disproportionately higher amount of biodiversity compared with mainlands, much of which is highly threatened with extinction. Indeed, island species make up nearly two-thirds of recent extinctions. Islands therefore are critical targets of conservation. We used an extensive literature and database review paired with expert interviews to estimate the global benefits of an increasingly used conservation action to stem biodiversity loss: eradication of invasive mammals on islands. We found 236 native terrestrial insular faunal species (596 populations) that benefitted through positive demographic and/or distributional responses from 251 eradications of invasive mammals on 181 islands. Seven native species (eight populations) were negatively impacted by invasive mammal eradication. Four threatened species had their International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List extinction-risk categories reduced as a direct result of invasive mammal eradication, and no species moved to a higher extinction-risk category. We predict that 107 highly threatened birds, mammals, and reptiles on the IUCN Red List-6% of all these highly threatened species-likely have benefitted from invasive mammal eradications on islands. Because monitoring of eradication outcomes is sporadic and limited, the impacts of global eradications are likely greater than we report here. Our results highlight the importance of invasive mammal eradication on islands for protecting the world's most imperiled fauna.conservation | restoration | invasive species | island | eradication T he rate of global species decline and extinction is rapid and likely to increase (1-4), although at least US$21.5 billion is spent annually worldwide on conservation of biodiversity (5). Improving conservation outcomes has focused largely on highlevel increases in efficiency, including the distribution of funding across countries (5), or on identifying the ecoregions, habitats, and species most in need (6). Although great strides have been made in promoting evidence-based conservation (7), systematic evaluations of the effectiveness of different actions taken to protect biodiversity at the global scale are rare, with the exception of protected areas (8).Islands occupy ∼5.5% of the terrestrial surface area but contain more than 15% of terrestrial species (9), 61% of all recently extinct species, and 37% of all critically endangered species on the International Union of the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List (10). Invasive nonnative mammals (hereafter, "invasive mammals") are the main cause of animal extinctions on islands and are one of the most important threats to remaining insular biodiversity (10-12). Eradicating invasive mammals from islands is an increasingly common conservation tool and has been ...

The effect of the zoo environment on captive animals is an increasingly studied area of zoo research, with visitor effects and exhibit design recognized as two of the factors that can contribute to animal welfare in captivity. It is known that in some situations, visitors may be stressful to zoo-housed primates, and this may be compounded by environmental factors such as the weather, the time of day, and zoo husbandry routines. Exhibit design and proximity of the public are also known to influence behavioral response of primates to visitors; however, there is minimal research on free-ranging zoo animals, even though they are potentially subjected to intense interactions with visitors. The current study explores the effect of the zoo environment, several visitor variables and specific animal-visitor interactions on the behavior of free-ranging ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) at Fota Wildlife Park, Ireland. Data were obtained through scan samples collected over 18 months (n = 12,263) and analyzed using a range of statistical tests, including general estimating equations (GEE). Results demonstrate that the free-ranging lemurs' behavior at Fota Wildlife Park is affected by season, weather and time of day. Similarities in feeding behavior exist between the free-ranging group and lemurs in the wild when resources are plentiful. Visitor variables had a limited effect on lemur behavior and behavioral diversity level. Lemurs rarely reacted to visitors when specific interactions were considered. Generally, the results indicate that the ring-tailed lemurs in this study have adapted well to the zoo environment and habituated to visitors.

Increasing our knowledge of the costs and benefits associated with commensal interactions is necessary both for a better understanding of how ecological communities are structured and for determining conservation actions. We investigated the concomitant use of a burrow by a nesting seabird, the fairy prion (Pachyptila turtur), and a medium-sized predatory reptile, the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus). Arrival time of fairy prions at the burrow each night was found to be delayed by the presence of a tuatara at the burrow. Use of the burrow by tuatara almost halved the time fairy prions spent at the burrow with their chick. The effect of this cohabitation on each species can be expected to change over both space and time, i.e. with changes in population densities and season. Hence it is possible that in newly established colonies of birds with low numbers in the presence of tuatara, tuatara predation may have a deleterious impact.

No abstract

No abstract