2018
DOI: 10.5371/hp.2018.30.4.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Simultaneous Computed Tomography and Quantitative Computed Tomography Show Better Prescription Rate than Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture?

Abstract: PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous computed tomography (CT) and quantitative CT (QCT) in patients with osteoporotic hip fracture (OHF) by analyzing the osteoporosis detection rate and physician prescription rate in comparison with those of conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).Materials and MethodsThis study included consecutive patients older than 65 years who underwent internal fixation or hip arthroplasty for OHF between February and May 2015. The patients were as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard modality of bone mineral density measurement. However, with the recent advancements in technology, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is recommended as an alternative or complementary diagnostic method due to its ability to separately evaluate three dimensional volumetric trabecular and cortical bone mineral densities and to show correct volumetric bone mineral density without being influenced by factors that affect bone size and shape such as degeneration and hypertrophic changes [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard modality of bone mineral density measurement. However, with the recent advancements in technology, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is recommended as an alternative or complementary diagnostic method due to its ability to separately evaluate three dimensional volumetric trabecular and cortical bone mineral densities and to show correct volumetric bone mineral density without being influenced by factors that affect bone size and shape such as degeneration and hypertrophic changes [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%