2019
DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the antibody mediated rejection grading scale have prognostic prediction? Yes, but the picture is still blurry

Abstract: Purpose of reviewAntibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a condition difficult to diagnose and treat, which may significantly impair the outcome of heart transplant recipients. In clinical practice, diagnosis is based on immunopathology grading of endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Despite its value, the current diagnostic system has several pitfalls that have been addressed in recent literature. Recent findingsPathology grading of ABMR (pAMR) has a relevant prognostic factor. However, it does not capture several nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, EMB was pAMR2, which we have previously shown to be more likely associated with DSA and overt graft dysfunction than pAMR1 3 . Nevertheless, the pAMR grading system is only modestly correlated to the outcome, with similar cardiovascular mortality among pAMR1 H+, pAMR1 I+, and pAMR2 patients, 20 and it does not provide definite guidance for patient management per se 21 . In fact, the natural history of AMR is more predicted by its clinical phenotype, and treatment recommendations are mainly based on the occurrence of concomitant graft dysfunction whatever underlying pAMR grade 2 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our case, EMB was pAMR2, which we have previously shown to be more likely associated with DSA and overt graft dysfunction than pAMR1 3 . Nevertheless, the pAMR grading system is only modestly correlated to the outcome, with similar cardiovascular mortality among pAMR1 H+, pAMR1 I+, and pAMR2 patients, 20 and it does not provide definite guidance for patient management per se 21 . In fact, the natural history of AMR is more predicted by its clinical phenotype, and treatment recommendations are mainly based on the occurrence of concomitant graft dysfunction whatever underlying pAMR grade 2 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…3 Nevertheless, the pAMR grading system is only modestly correlated to the outcome, with similar cardiovascular mortality among pAMR1 H+, pAMR1 I+, and pAMR2 patients, 20 and it does not provide definite guidance for patient management per se. 21 In fact, the natural history of AMR is more predicted by its clinical phenotype, and treatment recommendations are mainly based on the occurrence of concomitant graft dysfunction whatever underlying pAMR grade. 2 Actually, the clinical presentation of cardiac AMR ranges from asymptomatic detection on routine EMB to severe allograft dysfunction and cardiogenic shock despite a seemingly similar appearance on EMB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%