2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2004.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the expansionary government spending crowd out the private consumption?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, to take the averages across time and across countries is the essence of the panel time series; however, taking the averages over cross-sectional units can be very sensitive to outliers (Nieh & Ho, 2006). To make up for this weakness, the FMOLS method is used to estimate The null hypothesis of these tests is that the panel series has a unit root (nonstationary series) except with the Hadri test which has no unit root in panel series.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, to take the averages across time and across countries is the essence of the panel time series; however, taking the averages over cross-sectional units can be very sensitive to outliers (Nieh & Ho, 2006). To make up for this weakness, the FMOLS method is used to estimate The null hypothesis of these tests is that the panel series has a unit root (nonstationary series) except with the Hadri test which has no unit root in panel series.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bean () argues that “not all public spending is of the hole‐in‐the‐ground variety; spending on services such as health and education and on the police force is a substitute for private expenditure.” Although this statement suggests that private and public consumption may not be separable, many studies include government spending in an addilog utility function as introduced in Equation . Examples are Auteri and Constantini (), Ho (), and Nieh and Ho () who estimate values of the EIS in private consumption below 0.45, between 1.25 and 7.5 (depending on different subsamples, see Section ), and around 0.8.…”
Section: Consumers' Preferences and The Eismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other studies report EIS estimates from different non‐United States and non‐United Kingdom countries without including rule‐of‐thumb consumers. Koedlijk and Smant () look at eight developed countries in North America, Europe, and Japan, while Nieh and Ho () study 23 OECD countries. Auteri and Constantini () and DelaCruz et al .…”
Section: Further Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, we solve the model for different values of the curvature parameter σg. Typical estimates for this parameter are about 1.1 for the United States (Amano and Wirjanto ()) and do not exceed 0.8 in panel studies for the OECD countries (Nieh and Ho, ). Also, in theoretical models with political disagreement the parameter σg is typically set below unity .…”
Section: Generalizing the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%