2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L

Abstract: The benefit does not justify the effort involved in the ranking task. For this reason, the addition of the ranking task to the present EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol is not an attractive option.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A different market research company was hired to conduct the face-to-face interviews; nevertheless, because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 77 interviews were conducted remotely using video conference facilities. Our interviewers had previous experience conducting C-TTO interviews, 4,19 but they also received a 1-day training course for this specific study. Initial participants were invited to a central location for being interviewed in a face-to-face setting.…”
Section: C-ttomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different market research company was hired to conduct the face-to-face interviews; nevertheless, because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 77 interviews were conducted remotely using video conference facilities. Our interviewers had previous experience conducting C-TTO interviews, 4,19 but they also received a 1-day training course for this specific study. Initial participants were invited to a central location for being interviewed in a face-to-face setting.…”
Section: C-ttomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derived insights can be used to develop thorough and specific guidelines to train, monitor and provide feedback to the interviewers (Sebastian et al, 2012). However, most studies tend to simply highlight that measures have been taken to control for potential interviewer effects (e.g., Marsden & Hollstein, 2022; Ramos-Goñi et al, 2016). For those studies that documented the presence of misbehaviours, they tend to focus on one or two of them (e.g., Dykema, 2005; Olbrich et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%