2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-013-0974-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Platanthera dilatata (Orchidaceae) complex contain cryptic species or continuously variable populations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We maximised the number of populations sampled rather than individuals per population because population structure of cytogenomes is typically high (e.g. Tarayre & Thompson, ; Petit et al ., ; McCauley & Ellis, ; Adhikari & Wallace, ; Bergero et al ., ). Furthermore, our sampling strategy provides a sufficient estimate of within‐population diversity to document differentiation of mitotypes among populations that vary in sex ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We maximised the number of populations sampled rather than individuals per population because population structure of cytogenomes is typically high (e.g. Tarayre & Thompson, ; Petit et al ., ; McCauley & Ellis, ; Adhikari & Wallace, ; Bergero et al ., ). Furthermore, our sampling strategy provides a sufficient estimate of within‐population diversity to document differentiation of mitotypes among populations that vary in sex ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hapeman and Inoue, 1997; Bateman et al, 2003, 2009; see also Efimov, 2011). Other DNA‐based studies have used genetic data to help explore speciation and hybridization in more narrowly defined groups of Platanthera , most notably the P. dilatata–hyperborea group (section Limnorchis ) in North America (e.g., Wallace, 2006; Adhikari and Wallace, 2014) and the P. bifolia–chlorantha group (section Platanthera ) in Eurasia in general and England in particular (Bateman et al, 2009, 2012; Pavarese et al, 2011). The P. bifolia–chlorantha group is of particular significance because it generated one of the classic textbook examples of presumed selection‐mediated coevolution between orchids and their pollinating insects (e.g., Nilsson, 1983, 1985; Maad and Nilsson, 2004; reviewed by Hapeman and Inoue, 1997; Bateman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Orchid Floras Of The Three Northern Macaromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, all of the morphometric matrices gathered on North American members of the P. dilatata-hyperborea group have consisted entirely of a compartively small number of continuous metric characters employed to describe floral parts. Nonetheless, it proved possible (just) to use these characters to discriminate between P. dilatata , P. aquilonis and their F1 hybrids or their allotetraploid product P. huronenesis (Catling & Catling, 1997; Wallace, 2006; Sears, 2008), and between two of the three varieties of P. dilatata (Adhikari & Wallace, 2014). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%