Does the position in the inter-sectoral knowledge space affect the international competitiveness of industries?

Abstract

This paper empirically investigates how the inter-sectoral knowledge flows affect the international competitiveness of industries, once controlling for both cost and other technological factors. Using patent data on 14 manufacturing industries in 16 OECD countries over the period 1995-2009, we apply a network-based approach to capture the effect of industries' position in the flows of technological knowledge across industries, which we label inter-sectoral knowledge space. We find that (i) centrality and local clustering in the inter-sectoral knowledge space positively affect the export market shares of an industry, (ii) such two effects are rather redundant and, (iii) national-level knowledge flows' impacts on international competitiveness are way stronger than international ones. Network measures of position in the knowledge space are found to be more relevant than standard technological indicators such as patent counts. Our results point to the importance of industries being well located in the stream of knowledge flows, rather than being innovative per-se, and offers an novel yet robust proxy to measure technological factors affecting trade performances. In addition, we find evidence of geographical boundaries of knowledge flows.

Knowledge and social relatedness shape research portfolio diversification

“…When we consider the monopartite projection on the PACS layer of the bipartite PACS-Articles network, counting the co-occurrences of all pairs of PACS produces a first approximation of the relatedness of sub-fields. A similar approach was used by Lamperti et al 16 for patent data. However, we need a measure of proximity that: (i) does not depend on the absolute popularity of the fields, and (ii) is symmetric.…”

Simulation research on knowledge flow in a collaborative innovation network

“…The third is that there must be a knowledge gap between the knowledge provider and the F I G U R E 1 Scale-free collaborative innovation network knowledge absorber. This knowledge gap can be a difference in knowledge stock or a difference caused by a difference in knowledge position (Caloghirou et al, 2018;Lamperti et al, 2019). The fourth is to have a knowledge flow environment.…”

Competitiveness and R&D Subsidies: The Case of the Industry 4.0 Program in Portugal

“…A vast theoretical and empirical literature (Amendola et al, 1993;Fagerberg, 1996) and contemporary texts (Baumann et al, 2019;Dosi et al, 2015;Lamperti et al, 2020;Laursen & Meliciani, 2010) analyzes the influence of technology and technological change on competitiveness at the micro, meso, and macro levels. In this context, the inclusion of technological factors, besides those related to costs, goes back to the work of Rosenberg et al (1992), which postulates that one of the main sources of absolute advantage of a country is derived from its relative technological position comparing to its competitors.…”