Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the R&amp;D Input of Agricultural Enterprises?

Jiang, Zhangsheng; Zhao, Xinzi; Zhou, Jie

doi:10.1109/access.2020.3047839

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Knowledge-based technologies of agricultural production and manufacturing, such as grain planting, are nonexclusive and noncompetitive to a certain extent and can produce enormous benefits to agricultural sectors but only a small part of it can be captured by innovating agribusiness firms (Gande et al, 2020). Although agribusiness firms are the main subjects of technological innovation, they often have low innovation motivation and initiative (Jiang & Zhou, 2020;C. Wang et al, 2017).…”

Section: The Interplay Between Benefits and Costsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Scholars have discussed the necessity of government subsidies (GS). To guide and stimulate the technological innovation of agribusiness firms, the government formulates different types of innovation support policies, such as enterprise R&D funding subsidies and technical transformation subsidies (Jiang & Zhou, 2020). The government is responsible for solving the insufficient supply of technological innovation, stimulating firms' innovation activities, and guiding the technological innovation of agribusiness firms.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Agribusiness diversification and technological innovation efficiency: A U‐shaped relationship

Zhang

Sun

et al. 2022

Agribusiness

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, agribusiness firms have increasingly diversified their product portfolio and expanded into new business areas through internal growth or acquisition, which can lead to the reallocation of innovation resources. This study examines the impact of agribusiness diversification (AD) on technological innovation efficiency (TIE) in China. Based on an 8‐year longitudinal dataset of 101 Chinese listed agribusiness firms from 2012 to 2019, this study applies the Tobit regression technique to reveal the underlying mechanism between AD and TIE. The empirical results show that: (1) the AD‐TIE relationship follows a U‐shaped pattern, that is, at low levels of AD, the AD‐TIE relationship is negative; at high levels of AD, the AD‐TIE relationship is positive. (2) government subsidies (GS) negatively moderate the U‐shaped relationship between AD and TIE, such that GS flattens the U‐shaped curve. Our findings have important implications for agribusiness managers and public policymakers. [EconLit citations: H25, L25, Q16].

show abstract

Section: The Interplay Between Benefits and Costsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agribusiness diversification and technological innovation efficiency: A U‐shaped relationship

Zhang

Sun

et al. 2022

Agribusiness

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In response to the above knowledge void, the main aim of this work is to explain the continuous promotion of government innovation construction and the continuous implementation of green development practices (Qiu et al, 2022b;Sheng et al, 2022). Firstly, the study systematically analyzes the influence mechanism of regional government innovation subsidies on GDE, as asserted in earlier studies (e.g., Jiang et al, 2021). From the perspective of government innovation governance and support, it generally evaluates the effect of LGIS and other key influencing factors (e.g., FAI, ER, IS, and FDI) on GDE improvement.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Government innovation support for green development efficiency in China: A regional analysis of key factors based on the dynamic GMM model

Khattak

Khan

Sun

et al. 2022

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Local government innovation support (LGIS) is an exogenous pulling force for high-quality economic development. Accurately identifying the mechanism by which LGIS affects green development remains practically and theoretically significant for building a long-term framework for driving green development. Based on provincial panel data (2010–2019), this paper uses the Super-SBM model to measure the green development efficiency (GDE) of different provinces in China. A dynamic panel GMM model is constructed to evaluate the significant relationship between LGIS and GDE and to explore the potential impact mechanism of other key factors such as fixed asset investment (FAI), environmental regulation (ER), industrial structure (IS), and foreign direct investment (FDI) on GDE. The estimation showed that LGIS had a positive impact on GDE. The data analysis indicated that GDE in the lag period significantly affected the GDE in the current period. More so, as per the results, the promoting effect of GDE in the second lag period gradually weakened due to the decline of LGIS and ER restrictions. The current model also revealed that FAI and ER inhibited the GDE progress, while IS and FAI had improved the state of GDE in the region. The research findings imply that China should further increase the government innovation expenditure, FDI utilization, and IS upgrade to promote high-quality economic development.

show abstract

“…Other findings include on government innovation policy and higher education in Shenzhen, China [6]; on local government innovation in the energy sector: a study of key actors' strategies and arguments [7]; and on government innovation policy and higher education in Shenzhen [8], China on fiscal decentralization, preference for government innovation, and municipal innovation in China [9]; (Shin, 2020) on Uzbekistan's Digital Transformation Through e-Government Innovation [10]; and on Ethiopia's Designing for Digital Government Innovation in Resource-Limited Countries [11]; Studies the relationship between government innovation funding and corporate value creation [12]; on the Mini track on digital government innovation: Social and service innovation in the digital age [13]; Do Monitoring Mechanisms Promote the Effects of Government Innovation Support Incentives on R & D Inputs for Agricultural Enterprises? [14]; on the Effects of Public Service Experiences on Adoption of Digital Government Innovations in Ethiopia [15]; on Government Innovation 4.0: Egypt's Digital Transformation Roadmap [16]; Towards a Digital and Industrial World X.0, as well as on sharing economic pathways to government innovation [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second section discusses the findings of previous research on public service innovation [18], describes the typology of public service innovations derived from the classification of public service innovations, the majority of which originate in the private sector and are internal, ignoring public values and collaborative nature. Chen's PSI (Public Service Innovation) typology for defining and categorizing innovation in public service organizations has two dimensions: the "innovation focus" (the three public value creation processes of strategy, capacity, and operation) and the "innovation locus" (internal and external).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Grand Model of Bureaucratic Reform in Strengthening Government Innovation: A Review of North Maluku Province, Indonesia

Deni¹,

Deni²,

Husain³

2022

JPPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to promote government innovation, this article outlines the overall goal of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia as well as how it is being implemented in North Moluccas Province. An exploratory qualitative methodology is used in this article's data analysis, which is complemented by theoretical evaluations of many sources on public administration innovation trends, public service innovation, and government innovation strategies. According to the theoretical review analysis, it indicates how a notion has changed from the most recent trend to the previous trend. This study must be done in order to comprehend the paradigm change in Indonesian economic innovation from conventional models to digital-based innovation. It is crucial to do this study to learn more about Indonesia's regional innovation's paradigm change from traditional models to bureaucratic innovation based on digital technologies. How come? By focusing this research in North Moluccas, it needs a new innovation in island-based administration since its topography comprises of isolated islands that are challenging to link in the public service network. The internal dynamics of Indonesia's Grand Design Bureaucracy from 2010 to 2014, 2015 to 2019, and 2020 to 2024 are related to this change in the trend. A number of conclusions are drawn from the discussion of this article, including the need that the North Maluku Provincial Government compare its accomplishments to those of other regional innovation indexes. By empowering state employees to carry out the digital transformation of public administration and services, North Maluku Province may accomplish public service innovation. The future of civilization, collective intelligence, and creative public service methods will be impacted by these autonomous data-based decision-making processes.

show abstract

Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the R&D Input of Agricultural Enterprises?

Cited by 11 publications

References 65 publications

Agribusiness diversification and technological innovation efficiency: A U‐shaped relationship

Agribusiness diversification and technological innovation efficiency: A U‐shaped relationship

Government innovation support for green development efficiency in China: A regional analysis of key factors based on the dynamic GMM model

The Grand Model of Bureaucratic Reform in Strengthening Government Innovation: A Review of North Maluku Province, Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About