2011
DOI: 10.3171/2010.9.spine10129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does vertebral level of pedicle subtraction osteotomy correlate with degree of spinopelvic parameter correction?

Abstract: Object Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a spinal realignment technique that may be used to correct sagittal spinal imbalance. Theoretically, the level and degree of resection via a PSO should impact the degree of sagittal plane correction in the setting of deformity. However, the quantitative effect of PSO level and focal angular change on postoperative spinopelvic parameters has not been well described. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
80
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2). An • Morbidity status (pulmonary, cardiac, renal thromboembolic disorder, allergies, overweight, previous spine and other surgery • Expectations of the patient additional reason to perform the osteotomy at L4 (unless the most relevant deformity is in the upper lumbar spine) is that a PSO at a more caudal level provides better correction of the PT while maintaining good potential of correction of the SVA [20]. In the authors' experience, PSOs at L3 or higher frequently result in good correction of SVA with persisting increased PT, suggesting that the need for active compensation (which leads to persistence of symptoms) has not been completely been solved.…”
Section: Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). An • Morbidity status (pulmonary, cardiac, renal thromboembolic disorder, allergies, overweight, previous spine and other surgery • Expectations of the patient additional reason to perform the osteotomy at L4 (unless the most relevant deformity is in the upper lumbar spine) is that a PSO at a more caudal level provides better correction of the PT while maintaining good potential of correction of the SVA [20]. In the authors' experience, PSOs at L3 or higher frequently result in good correction of SVA with persisting increased PT, suggesting that the need for active compensation (which leads to persistence of symptoms) has not been completely been solved.…”
Section: Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decrease in sacral slope implies loss of lumbar lordosis. 2,9,10 Although each PLIF achieved local lordosis at the fused segment, lumbar lordosis decreased gradually due to kyphosis of the cranial adjacent segment. A decrease in sacral slope might cause kyphotic mechanical force adjacent to the fused segment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that time, she was postmenopausal but did not demonstrate generalized osteoarthritis and secondary osteoporosis (rheumatoid arthritis-or steroid-induced). The bone mineral density of the femoral neck and young adult mean were 0.847 g/ cm 2 and 98%, respectively. No osteoporosis was detected.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same line of reasoning, a correction was considered to be successful only in cases that satisfied 3 postoperative criteria: SVA ≤ 5cm, -10˚ ≤ PI-LL ≤ 10˚, and PT ≤ 24˚. [8][9][10][11]18 Thus, the effect of the surgery was evaluated not only on overall sagittal balance, but also on the use of compensatory spinopelvic mechanisms. Using these criteria to analyze a multicenter database with 99 cases of pedicle subtraction, 8 corrections were achieved in 55% of cases, while by considering only the normalization of the SVA, success would be 65%, similar to the 62% observed by Schwab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%