2017
DOI: 10.1177/1466138117697996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing ‘dangerous’ autoethnography on Islamophobic victimization

Abstract: This article draws on our different experiences of employing autoethnography when researching Islamophobia, using two independent research projects. In particular, we reflect upon our experiences of Islamophobic victimization as a result of being 'visibly' Muslim in public spaces in the UK. We discuss our motivation for employing autoethnography and the role of our insider/outsider status in adopting the role of the Muslim 'other' in public spaces. Additionally, we consider the nature, extent and impact of Isl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overt and profound hostility to hijab-wearing women in England in street-level interactions has been described by ethnographers (Zempi and Awan 2017); public hostility, combined with "private hostility" on the part of employers, may have profoundly negative consequences for "quiet civility", the manner that Muslim immigrants and their children traditionally bring to British society (Al-Refai and Bagley 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overt and profound hostility to hijab-wearing women in England in street-level interactions has been described by ethnographers (Zempi and Awan 2017); public hostility, combined with "private hostility" on the part of employers, may have profoundly negative consequences for "quiet civility", the manner that Muslim immigrants and their children traditionally bring to British society (Al-Refai and Bagley 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One continuing debate regards researchers' statuses as 'insiders' -those who study populations who are similar to themselves -or 'outsiders' -those who study populations who differ from themselves -influence their work (Young Jr, 2008;Innes, 2009;Davis, 1997, Aguilar, 1981. Although we all retain both characteristics because we have multiple statuses (Merton, 1972) and can experience a handful of 'insider moments' with participants (May, 2014) and/or being the 'outsider within' (Collins, 1986;Zempi and Awan, 2017), social science researchers have a long history of focusing on how one or two of their traits compare to their participants (e.g. Meyerhoff, 1980;Duneier, 1999).…”
Section: Reflexivity In Qualitative Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance to stigma is discursive and performative. White supremacy prevails in society to position non-white persons in inferior and deviant categories (Zempi and Awan, 2017). I suspect that his desire to construct my visible Muslim and non-white identity as ‘deviant’ acted as a way to reinforce his hierarchical superior position by way of subordinating and emasculating me through discourse.…”
Section: Do We Ever Truly Leave the Field?mentioning
confidence: 99%