2012
DOI: 10.2752/175145212x13233396185431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing Family Photography: The Domestic, the Public and the Politics of Sentiment: Gillian Rose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Widespread use of smartphone cameras is likely changing how and why people take photos in their everyday lives (e.g. Hand, 2012;Rose, 2016;Sandbye and Larsen, 2013;Van Dijck, 2007). Digital cameras facilitate the taking of many photos during informal activities, maintaining larger unorganized archives, and allow for easy editing and sharing (Sarvas and Frohlich, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Widespread use of smartphone cameras is likely changing how and why people take photos in their everyday lives (e.g. Hand, 2012;Rose, 2016;Sandbye and Larsen, 2013;Van Dijck, 2007). Digital cameras facilitate the taking of many photos during informal activities, maintaining larger unorganized archives, and allow for easy editing and sharing (Sarvas and Frohlich, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work in feminist geography has expanded to engage with the cyborgisation of everyday life (Militz et al 2021;Schuurman, 2002;Wilson, 2009), the gendered and intersectional effects of technological change (Richardson, 2018;Rose, 2016), and the way technology connects intimate life to the global circulation of technological artefacts, scientific knowledge production, and data circuits (Pratt and Rosner, 2012;Valentine, 2006). Feminist geographies of technoscience centre the body, the subject, and the intimate as scales of analysis, departing from the everyday experiences of socio-technical bodies to study the connectedness of these intimate experiences with the global circulation of technologies.…”
Section: Sites Of Intimate Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these contributions come from feminist geographers charting the ways in which digital technologies become domesticated and how, in turn, domesticity and practices of intimacy increasingly extend into digital space. Gillian Rose's work highlights how people enact domesticity and maternal care through family photography and how the ubiquity and ease of use of visual digital devices, software, and platforms have considerably enhanced these everyday practices (Rose, 2016(Rose, , 2020. As Robyn Longhurst (2013) shows in her study on maternal practices involving Skype, digital technologies that support maintaining intimate relationships stretch the horizons of home: 'the dwelling places of bodies are no longer just rooms in homes where mothers, and children's flesh and emotions rub up against each other on a daily basis but screens across which voices and, even more importantly, images are shared' (Longhurst, 2013: 664).…”
Section: Homementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gillian Rose (2014) z kolei wskazuje, że choć technologie wykonywania i udostępniania zdjęć uległy zmianie, to ich znaczenie oraz znaczenie związanych z nimi praktyk pozostają takie same. Pojawienie się nowych technologii jedynie zintensyfikowało praktyki związane z rodzinną fotografią (Rose 2010(Rose , 2014zob. także Harding 2016), a media społecznościowe zaczęły odgrywać rolę rodzinnych albumów.…”
Section: Wykorzystanie Koncepcji Demonstrowania Rodzinności W Analizi...unclassified