2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful: Acknowledging appearance mitigates the “beauty is beastly” effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conclusions are consistent with earlier research which suggests that attractive women are discriminated against when they are not seen as fit for certain jobs, such as management positions , directors of security (Johnson, Podratz, Dipboye, & Gibbons, 2010), or construction workers (Johnson et al, 2014). In addition, both men and women are discriminated against when seen as a personal threat to decision makers' individual goals (e.g., Agthe et al, 2011;Buunk et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2015), and evaluators are weary of attractive individuals when they are evaluating candidates for less desirable jobs because of a concern that such individuals may aspire to more (Lee et al, 2018).…”
Section: A Comparison Of the Attractiveness Advantage Pre-and Post-2000supporting
confidence: 92%
“…These conclusions are consistent with earlier research which suggests that attractive women are discriminated against when they are not seen as fit for certain jobs, such as management positions , directors of security (Johnson, Podratz, Dipboye, & Gibbons, 2010), or construction workers (Johnson et al, 2014). In addition, both men and women are discriminated against when seen as a personal threat to decision makers' individual goals (e.g., Agthe et al, 2011;Buunk et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2015), and evaluators are weary of attractive individuals when they are evaluating candidates for less desirable jobs because of a concern that such individuals may aspire to more (Lee et al, 2018).…”
Section: A Comparison Of the Attractiveness Advantage Pre-and Post-2000supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, whilst in our study positive distinctiveness appeared to be most available to early career stage women, it could be that career stage is not the only relevant dimension from which to consider issues of accessibility. For example, based on the work of Johnson, Sitzmann and Nguyen (2014), it would be interesting to investigate whether people who are seen as 'attractive' have more symbolic power to use strategies of positive distinctiveness and/or if they feel a greater need to manage sexualised visibility through avoidance. We did not consider attractiveness as a dimension in our study and we are not in a position to judge our respondents' attractiveness.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledgment can be effective at improving evaluations of individuals with stigmatized identities in interview settings (Hebl & Kleck, 2002;Johnson, Sitzmann, & Nguyen, 2014;Lyons et al, 2018). Past research has shown that interviewers (and perceivers of interactions) rate applicants with various stigmatized identities (e.g., people with disabilities, Hebl & Kleck, 2002;stutterers, Mills, Belgrave, & Boyer, 1984;obese individuals, Hebl & Kleck, 2002) who acknowledge versus those who do not acknowledge higher on measures of likeability, hireability, and other positive aspects.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research has shown that interviewers (and perceivers of interactions) rate applicants with various stigmatized identities (e.g., people with disabilities, Hebl & Kleck, 2002;stutterers, Mills, Belgrave, & Boyer, 1984;obese individuals, Hebl & Kleck, 2002) who acknowledge versus those who do not acknowledge higher on measures of likeability, hireability, and other positive aspects. Additionally, research shows that acknowledgment can help direct attention away from a stigma characteristic (Madera & Hebl, 2012), counteract negative stereotypes, lead to more positive evaluations (Johnson et al, 2014;Lyons et al, 2018), and decrease displays of interpersonal forms of discrimination toward applicants with a stigma characteristic (Singletary & Hebl, 2009). Despite these doc-umented benefits, acknowledgment is not a one-size-fits-all identity management strategy.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%