2021
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2021.1959751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Don’t think it’s a good idea! Four building sites of the ‘ideas school’

Abstract: Ideational explanations of policy change are popular in the fields of political economy, comparative politics and policy analysis. And yet, to make the case for ideational explanations, we must make further progress on the nature of ideas, where they come from, what they consist of, and how they change over time. We highlight four critical building sites concerning the definitional aspects of ideational explanations, micro-foundations, mechanisms and the difference between ideational and cognitive analysis. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crisis has long been central to what is known as the "ideas school" in public policy (Kamkhaji & Radaelli, 2022).…”
Section: A Critical Review Of Ideas-crisis Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Crisis has long been central to what is known as the "ideas school" in public policy (Kamkhaji & Radaelli, 2022).…”
Section: A Critical Review Of Ideas-crisis Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crisis has long been central to what is known as the “ideas school” in public policy (Kamkhaji & Radaelli, 2022). Several of the more prominent early accounts of ideas in policy‐making saw crises as generating the conditions for ideational change.…”
Section: A Critical Review Of Ideas‐crisis Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, policy change scholarship generally is more comfortable and successful in providing ex-post explanations of policy change than ex-ante recommendations for pathways towards it. Despite ongoing refinement of different theories of policy change (for example, Oliver and Pemberton, 2004;Mahoney and Thelen, 2009;Cairney and Weible, 2015;Zohlnhöfer et al, 2015;van der Heijden and Kuhlmann, 2017;Fernández-i-Marín et al, 2019;Weible et al, 2020;Derwort et al, 2021;Kamkhaji and Radaelli, 2021), broadly accepted definitions of degrees of policy change -such as paradigmatic, transformative, major or even incremental and minor -are missing. In addition, analyses of policy change are not easy to compare or integrate as they often rely on idiosyncratic or unsystematic empirical measurement of policy change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideas and learning have been a cornerstone of political analysis for a long time (Simon 1957(Simon , 1947Deutsch 1966;Heclo 1974;Goyal and Howlett 2018b;Vagionaki and Trein 2020 ). Research dealing with ideas in political science and public policy has used learning as a mechanism of how society embraces new and disposes of old ideas (e.g., Hall 1993;Kamkhaji and Radaelli 2020). In the political sphere, learning can involve changes at different levels of ideas, such as policy ideas, or, which is much rarer, actors' core beliefs (Jenkins-Smith et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%