2021
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2021.1878667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning heuristics, issue salience and polarization in the policy process

Abstract: and a senior fellow at UC Berkeley. His research interests cover policy coordination and integration, the politics of digital public policy, health policy, and federalism as well as multilevel governance. His research has been published in leading political science and public policy journals as well as with major university presses. More information can be found here: www.philipptrein.com Thenia Vagionaki is a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Political Studies at the University of Lausanne in Switze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, due to the divisive risk perceptions this crisis creates, there is more room for politicization and contestation, particularly during interspersing periods of calmness and uneven threat perceptions (see Boin et al, 2020). This creates perturbations in the policy‐making context, often necessitating different approaches to engaging with knowledge and expertise (e.g., Boswell, 2008; Trein & Vagionaki, 2022), and changes in policy issue construction necessitating different types of learning (e.g., Dunlop & Radaelli, 2013). These conditions make it likely that settings and calibrations of existing policy instruments require frequent finetuning to match the evolving crisis nature (e.g., May, 1992), or that understandings of policy issue construction are adjusted to align with its evolving meanings.…”
Section: Policy Learning and Crises: A Case Of The Covid‐19 Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, due to the divisive risk perceptions this crisis creates, there is more room for politicization and contestation, particularly during interspersing periods of calmness and uneven threat perceptions (see Boin et al, 2020). This creates perturbations in the policy‐making context, often necessitating different approaches to engaging with knowledge and expertise (e.g., Boswell, 2008; Trein & Vagionaki, 2022), and changes in policy issue construction necessitating different types of learning (e.g., Dunlop & Radaelli, 2013). These conditions make it likely that settings and calibrations of existing policy instruments require frequent finetuning to match the evolving crisis nature (e.g., May, 1992), or that understandings of policy issue construction are adjusted to align with its evolving meanings.…”
Section: Policy Learning and Crises: A Case Of The Covid‐19 Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Policy learning is mostly understood as "the acquisition of new relevant information that permits the updating of beliefs about the effect of a new policy" (Braun & Gilardi, 2006, p. 306). Scholars have long explored exactly how this updating of beliefs occurs and what it means for policymakers in a variety of contexts and policy processes Vagionaki & Trein, 2020;Trein & Vagionaki, 2022). A more encompassing definition of policy learning views it as "1) a collective process, which may include acquiring information through diverse actions (e.g.…”
Section: Policy Learning Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, Cino Pagliarello argues, we must face it up-front and include it in ideational explanations in suitable ways, with the assistance of the insights of sociology of science. Trein and Vagionaki (2021) draw on the behavioural economics and crisis management literature to embed issue salience and polarisation in mechanisms of power and policy-oriented learning.…”
Section: Reconstructing Ideational Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%