2017
DOI: 10.1515/crelle-2017-0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donaldson–Thomas invariants versus intersection cohomology of quiver moduli

Abstract: Abstract. The main result of this paper is the statement that the Hodge theoretic Donaldson-Thomas invariant for a quiver with zero potential and a generic stability condition agrees with the compactly supported intersection cohomology of the closure of the stable locus inside the associated coarse moduli space of semistable quiver representations. In fact, we prove an even stronger result relating the Donaldson-Thomas "function" to the intersection complex. The proof of our main result relies on a relative ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
108
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(151 reference statements)
2
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After a reminder of some notation and constructions regarding quiver representations in §6.1, in §6.2 we prove a positivity result for the refined DT invariants of the category of right modules for the path algebra CQ of a quiver Q. This generalizes a positivity result in [MR19] which applied only to the case of acyclic quivers. The proof of this theorem is within the framework of cohomological Donaldson-Thomas theory.…”
Section: Positivity For Donaldson-thomas Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After a reminder of some notation and constructions regarding quiver representations in §6.1, in §6.2 we prove a positivity result for the refined DT invariants of the category of right modules for the path algebra CQ of a quiver Q. This generalizes a positivity result in [MR19] which applied only to the case of acyclic quivers. The proof of this theorem is within the framework of cohomological Donaldson-Thomas theory.…”
Section: Positivity For Donaldson-thomas Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…On the other hand, since with a little work, the original positivity result of Meinhardt and Reineke [MR19], written in the language of refined DT theory, can be used to prove the pL preservation statement of Theorem 2.15, we present this version of the theory in §6.3. Since the pL property is stronger than positivity, this provides an alternative proof of the (strong) positivity of quantum theta functions.…”
Section: Positivity For Donaldson-thomas Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a concrete example, for Z pure dimensional with coefficients given by the intersection cohomology Hodge module IC H Z on Z, the corresponding Schur functor S µ of π n * IC H Z n is given by the twisted intersection cohomology Hodge module S µ (π n * IC H Z n ) = IC H Z (n) (V µ ) with twisted coefficients corresponding to the local system on the configuration space B(Z, n) of unordered n-tuples of distinct points in Z, induced from V µ by the group homomorphism π 1 (B(Z, n)) → Σ n (compare [28][p.293] and [30][Prop.3.5]). For Z projective and pure-dimensional, by taking the degrees in (19) for the present choice of coefficients IC H Z and representation V µ , we obtain the following identity for the χ y -polynomial of the twisted intersection cohomology:…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite some computations of motivic or even numerical Donaldson-Thomas invariants for quivers with potential (see [2,6,4,27]), the true nature of Donaldson-Thomas invariants for quiver with potential remained mysterious for quite some time. A full understanding has been obtained recently and is the content of a series of papers [7,5,26,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%