While controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCDD) donors could increase the supply of donor lungs within the United States, the yield of lungs from cDCDD donors remain low compared to donation after neurologic determination of death (DNDD) donors. To explore the reason for low lung yield from cDCDD donors, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient data were used to assess the impact of donor lung quality on cDCDD lung utilization by fitting a logistic regression model. The relationship between center volume and cDCDD use was assessed and distance between center and donor hospital was calculated by cDCDD status. Recipient survival was compared using a multivariable Cox regression model. Lung utilization was 2.1% for cDCDD donors and 21.4% for DNDD donors. Being a cDCDD donor decreased lung donation (adjusted OR 0.101, CI 0.085–0.120). A minority of centers have performed cDCDD transplant with higher volume centers generally performing more cDCDD transplants. There was no difference in center to donor distance or recipient survival (adjusted HR 1.03, CI 0.78–1.37) between cDCDD and DNDD transplants. cDCDD lungs are underutilized compared to DNDD lungs after adjusting for lung quality. Increasing transplant center expertise and commitment to cDCDD lung procurement is needed to improve utilization.