1999
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/14.4.930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor age and delayed graft function as predictors of renal allograft survival in rejection-free patients

Abstract: Regardless of the presence of acute rejection, delayed graft function amplifies the detrimental effect of advanced donor age on long-term graft outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
120
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
120
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result could be anticipated taking into consideration that DGF is associated with an increased recruitment of inflammatory cells and an increased risk for the development of acute rejection (32,33). Even in rejection-free patients, DGF is an independent risk factor for late graft failure owing to CAN (34).…”
Section: Progression Of Chronic Allograft Nephropathymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This result could be anticipated taking into consideration that DGF is associated with an increased recruitment of inflammatory cells and an increased risk for the development of acute rejection (32,33). Even in rejection-free patients, DGF is an independent risk factor for late graft failure owing to CAN (34).…”
Section: Progression Of Chronic Allograft Nephropathymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nevertheless, the allocation of organs from older donors to older recipients is currently the chosen strategy of the Eurotransplant Senior Program [20]. Our data, as well as a recently published report [17] indicate that in view of the unclear long-term prognosis of these grafts, at least the additional risk factor of DGF and in turn, long cold ischemic times, should be avoided as far as possible. The Eurotransplant Program addresses this particular point with its recommendation that the cold ischemic time be less than 8 h. Although the initial results indicate an acceptable short-term prognosis of the patients receiving transplants in the context of the Senior Program [24], more extensive figures are required before such a policy can, in our opinion, be generally recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Several definitions of DGF are applied in the current literature, thus influencing the reported incidences. Many studies define DGF as the need for any or more than one dialysis session in a specified postoperative period [12,16,17,25, 261, a definition that is easy to apply especially for aquisition of data in large registries. However, there are undoubtedly forms of early impairment of allograft function that do not require postoperative dialysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tekintettel arra, hogy a KDPI egyik legfontosabb összetevője a donor életkora, ez az allokációs gyakorlat összhangban van az Eurotransplant Senior Programjával, amely során a 65 évnél idősebb donorok veséjét 65 évnél idősebb, nem immunizált (PRA<5%) recipienseknek ajánlják fel, előze-tesen nem figyelembe véve a HLA-egyezést [11,12], előnyben részesítve az alacsony CIT-időt. Az idősebb vesék ugyanis érzékenyebbek az ischaemiás-reperfúziós károsodásra, ennek következtében gyakrabban lép fel delayed graft function, ami a vesetúlélést is negatívan befolyásolja [13,14]. Az ET Senior Program eddigi eredmé-nyeit megerősíti az a tény, hogy ebben a csoportban a 3 éves grafttúlélés (a beteg halála miatti graftvesztés kizárá-sával) nem különbözött a hagyományos HLA-egyezésen alapuló allokációs rendszerben észlelttől [15].…”
Section: áBra 1-3 éVes Grafttúlélés Az Ecd/scd Illetve Dds-csoportokbanunclassified