1999
DOI: 10.1002/jlb.66.2.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor dendritic cell persistence in organ allograft recipients in the absence of immunosuppression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is noted that there exist CXCL16-expressing infiltrating cells in the tolerated grafts (Fig. 3) as previously reported by several investigators that APCs, including dendritic cells and macrophages which can express CXCL16 (9,(12)(13)(14), are migrated into long-surviving allografts (23). The existence of CXCL16-expressing cells in the tolerated allografts indicates that there is an inflammation to some extent, which is in line with the observation that sole CD40L blockade therapy cannot prevent chronic rejection of the allografts (24).…”
Section: Adhesion Of Nkt Cells To Membrane-bound Cxcl16supporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, it is noted that there exist CXCL16-expressing infiltrating cells in the tolerated grafts (Fig. 3) as previously reported by several investigators that APCs, including dendritic cells and macrophages which can express CXCL16 (9,(12)(13)(14), are migrated into long-surviving allografts (23). The existence of CXCL16-expressing cells in the tolerated allografts indicates that there is an inflammation to some extent, which is in line with the observation that sole CD40L blockade therapy cannot prevent chronic rejection of the allografts (24).…”
Section: Adhesion Of Nkt Cells To Membrane-bound Cxcl16supporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is recognized that donor-derived APCs residing in the interstitium of allografts, in particular macrophages and DCs, are instigators of primary allospecific immune responses via direct alloantigen presentation to recipient responder cells within secondary lymphatic tissue 11,14,39 . However, due to their potent ability to instigate an adaptive immune response by activating naïve T cells, DCs are generally regarded as primary initiators of allograft rejection 39,40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have focused on the importance of ongoing Ag exposure and/or of tolerogenic DCs in maintenance of allograft survival (22), with recent studies suggesting that indirect Ag presentation can break graft tolerance, while in tolerant animals, direct Ag presentation can suppress rejection (29). Some of the altered development of DCs is apparently a reflection of the altered cytokine milieu in the transplanted tissue that, along with CD200-CD200R interactions, can control the status of monocyte differentiation, promoting in vitro induction of Tregs and/or in vivo protection from autoimmune diseases (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously reported that improved acceptance of skin allografts in mice was associated with increased expression of a number of distinct mRNAs, one of which encoded CD200, a molecule expressed on the surface of dendritic cells DCs 3 (4,12); that using a soluble immunoadhesin (CD200Fc), in which the extracellular domain of CD200 was linked to a murine IgG2aFc region, or in mice which overexpression of a transgenic CD200 was under control of a doxycycline (Dox)-inducible promoter, inhibition of T cell allostimulation and type 1 cytokine production (IL-2, IFN-␥) occurred in vitro and in vivo (13,14); and that CD200-mediated immunoregulation reflected signaling following an interaction with receptors, CD200Rs, on the surface of myeloid and or lymphoid cells (15)(16)(17), which could in turn favor development of "tolerogenic" DCs and/or regulatory T cells (Tregs) that were implicated in enhanced graft survival (18,19). A large and growing body of work confirms the importance of Tregs in transplantation tolerance (20,21) and the interrelatedness of this with DC function (22)(23)(24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%