2022
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.822353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor–Recipient Non-HLA Variants, Mismatches and Renal Allograft Outcomes: Evolving Paradigms

Abstract: Despite significant improvement in the rates of acute allograft rejection, proportionate improvements in kidney allograft longevity have not been realized, and are a source of intense research efforts. Emerging translational data and natural history studies suggest a role for anti-donor immune mechanisms in a majority of cases of allograft loss without patient death, even when overt evidence of acute rejection is not identified. At the level of the donor and recipient genome, differences in highly polymorphic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a previous study, Cldn8 overexpression leads to the downregulation of Cldn2 expression (36). The hyperexpression of Epb41L2, Prkcb, Shroom3 are implicated in adhesion damage (37)(38)(39). MBZ is a classic chemotherapeutic agent available for CE treatment (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a previous study, Cldn8 overexpression leads to the downregulation of Cldn2 expression (36). The hyperexpression of Epb41L2, Prkcb, Shroom3 are implicated in adhesion damage (37)(38)(39). MBZ is a classic chemotherapeutic agent available for CE treatment (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing evidence that donor-recipient mismatches at non-HLA regions may also be responsible for alloimmunity leading to chronic rejection and allograft loss. These mechanisms are discussed in detail by Jethwani et al [ 36 ]. There are currently limited diagnostic and therapeutic options for the prevention or treatment of non-HLA antibody mediated rejection.…”
Section: Pre-transplant Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential confounding factors influencing the association between genetic markers and renal rejection include different gene-expression-analysis technologies (microarray vs. RNAseq), obtaining extra biopsy cores for profiling, and variability in blood tacrolimus concentrations affecting transplant outcomes and AR risk [ 62 ]. One of the most critical genetic markers for renal rejection is the HLA mismatch, which refers to differences in human leukocyte antigen between the donor and recipient [ 63 , 64 ]. The HLA system plays a crucial role in presenting antigens to the immune system and is involved in the recognition and rejection of foreign tissues.…”
Section: Genetic Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%