1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1382-6689(97)00147-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopamine D1 antagonist SCH23390 attenuates self-administration of both cocaine and fentanyl in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, dopamine receptor antagonists may have decreased this motivation, thereby resulting in the observed decreases in drug self-administration (Arnold and Roberts 1997;Cardinal and Everitt 2004). These findings are similar to those of previous studies conducted at the systemic level, which demonstrate that selective dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists attenuated cocaine selfadministration in rats (Awasaki et al 1997;Corrigall and Coen 1991a;Richardson et al 1993). Additionally, these findings are comparable to those of studies conducted at the level of the nucleus accumbens, which demonstrate that dopamine transmission is directly reinforcing in this region (Carlezon et al 1995;Ikemoto et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the present study, dopamine receptor antagonists may have decreased this motivation, thereby resulting in the observed decreases in drug self-administration (Arnold and Roberts 1997;Cardinal and Everitt 2004). These findings are similar to those of previous studies conducted at the systemic level, which demonstrate that selective dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists attenuated cocaine selfadministration in rats (Awasaki et al 1997;Corrigall and Coen 1991a;Richardson et al 1993). Additionally, these findings are comparable to those of studies conducted at the level of the nucleus accumbens, which demonstrate that dopamine transmission is directly reinforcing in this region (Carlezon et al 1995;Ikemoto et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, if decreased dopamine release is the parsimonious mechanism that underlies reduced methamphetamine‐ and fentanyl‐induced behaviors in Hn1+/− mice, a more pronounced behavioral effect would be expected in response to a psychostimulant compared with an opioid. We should also note that we previously found indirect evidence for modulation of hnRNP H immunohistochemical staining in cultured rat primary neurons in response to D1 but not D2 receptor activation that was reversed by a D1 receptor antagonist 20 ; thus, because our more recent study did not distinguish between the pre‐ and postsynaptic synaptosome, 19 an alteration in postsynaptic D1 receptor signaling in Hn1+/− mice could also comprise a molecular mechanism underlying both psychostimulant and opioid behaviors 59 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A number of studies have shown that D 1 -or D 2 -preferring antagonists inhibit cocaine self-administration, cocaineenhanced BSR, and cocaine-triggered reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior (Wilson and Schuster, 1972;de Wit and Wise, 1977;Koob et al, 1987;Bergman et al, 1990;Corrigall and Coen, 1991;McGregor and Roberts, 1993;Caine and Koob, 1994;Caine et al, 1995Caine et al, , 2002Self et al, 1996;Awasaki et al, 1997;Ikemoto et al, 1997;Kita et al, 1999;Spealman et al, 1999;Khroyan et al, 2000Khroyan et al, , 2003Hummel and Unterwald, 2002;Norman et al, 2002;Anderson et al, 2003;Sanchez et al, 2003; for reviews see Platt et al, 2002;Kapur and Mamo, 2003;Gorelick et al, 2004). Consequently, this raises the issue of whether the presently observed attenuating effects of NGB 2904 in these three behavioral paradigms might be attributable to D 1 or D 2 receptor-selective antagonism rather than to D 3 receptor-selective antagonism.…”
Section: Ngb 2904's Selective Blockade Of Da D 3 Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%