Dopamine-Mediated Stabilization of Delay-Period Activity in a Network Model of Prefrontal Cortex

Abstract

jnowski. Dopamine-mediated stabilization of delay-period activity in a network model of prefrontal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 1733Neurophysiol. 83: -1750Neurophysiol. 83: , 2000. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is critically involved in working memory, which underlies memory-guided, goal-directed behavior. During working-memory tasks, PFC neurons exhibit sustained elevated activity, which may reflect the active holding of goal-related information or the preparation of forthcoming actions. Dopamine via the D1 receptor strongly modulates both this sustained (delay-period) activity and behavioral performance in working-memory tasks. However, the function of dopamine during delay-period activity and the underlying neural mechanisms are only poorly understood. Recently we proposed that dopamine might stabilize active neural representations in PFC circuits during tasks involving working memory and render them robust against interfering stimuli and noise. To further test this idea and to examine the dopamine-modulated ionic currents that could give rise to increased stability of neural representations, we developed a network model of the PFC consisting of multicompartment neurons equipped with Hodgkin-Huxley-like channel kinetics that could reproduce in vitro whole cell and in vivo recordings from PFC neurons. Dopaminergic effects on intrinsic ionic and synaptic conductances were implemented in the model based on in vitro data. Simulated dopamine strongly enhanced high, delay-type activity but not low, spontaneous activity in the model network. Furthermore the strength of an afferent stimulation needed to disrupt delay-type activity increased with the magnitude of the dopamine-induced shifts in network parameters, making the currently active representation much more stable. Stability could be increased by dopamine-induced enhancements of the persistent Na ϩ and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) conductances. Stability also was enhanced by a reduction in AMPA conductances. The increase in GABA A conductances that occurs after stimulation of dopaminergic D1 receptors was necessary in this context to prevent uncontrolled, spontaneous switches into high-activity states (i.e., spontaneous activation of task-irrelevant representations).In conclusion, the dopamine-induced changes in the biophysical properties of intrinsic ionic and synaptic conductances conjointly acted to highly increase stability of activated representations in PFC networks and at the same time retain control over network behavior and thus preserve its ability to adequately respond to task-related stimuli. Predictions of the model can be tested in vivo by locally applying specific D1 receptor, NMDA, or GABA A antagonists while recording from PFC neurons in delayed reaction-type tasks with interfering stimuli.

Reconciling reinforcement learning models with behavioral extinction and renewal: Implications for addiction, relapse, and problem gambling.

“…However, many models of categorization learning have been based on a similar prototype-centered process much like that used here (Ashby & Maddox, 2005;Hertz et al, 1991;Kéri, 2003;Lakoff, 1990). This model can be conceptually translated into standard distributed (neural) models of cortex and hippocampus (Arbib, 1995;Durstewitz, Kelc, & Gunturkun, 1999;Durstewitz, Seamans, & Sejnowski, 2000;Redish, 1999;Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986;Seamans, Gorelova, Durstewitz, & Yang, 2001;Seamans & Yang, 2004).…”

Computational modeling and exploration of contour integration for visual saliency

“…Interneurons are also known to connect to many neurons at the same time, sending inhibitory synaptic currents to a possibly large population of pyramidal dopamine neurons (Durstewitz et al 2000;Gao and GoldmanRakic 2003). The firing of these neurons has also been shown to have dramatic effects on the neurons they connect since they can exhibit spikes at very high rates (100 Hz) (Bracci et al 2003) and can have low firing thresholds as well as a need for few inputs (Krimer and Goldman-Rakic 2001).…”

Dopamine and glutamate receptor genes interactively influence episodic memory in old age

“…Computational simulations suggest that dopaminergic modulation stabilizes NMDA currents, resulting in sharpened memory representations (e.g., Durstewitz et al, 1999Durstewitz et al, , 2000. Other than their separate effects, animal research also suggests that the DA and glutamate systems may interact in influencing memory performance (Adriani et al, 1998;Cestari and Castellano, 1997;Ferretti et al, 2005;Mele et al, 1996).…”