1995
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.15-07-05169.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopaminergic correlates of motivated behavior: importance of drive

Abstract: In vivo brain microdialysis was used to monitor changes in dopamine (DA) release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) during anticipatory and consummatory components of feeding behavior. During 10 daily training sessions, rats were first confined to one compartment of a testing chamber for 10 minutes. During this period (anticipatory phase) they were prevented from gaining access to a highly palatable liquid meal by a wire mesh screen. The screen was then removed and the animals were permitted to consume the meal fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
168
6
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
168
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Current results suggest that consummatory rather than anticipatory aspects of feeding are associated with the activation of the mesolimbic pathway. This possibility agrees with previous microdialysis studies showing that Acb dopamine release mainly occurs during the consummatory phase of feeding and not during the anticipatory phase (Sahr et al, 2008;Wilson et al, 1995). Notably, an activation of the MAcbSh neurons was detected in anticipation to the fourth HFD consumption event, similarly as found for the IF dopamine neurons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Current results suggest that consummatory rather than anticipatory aspects of feeding are associated with the activation of the mesolimbic pathway. This possibility agrees with previous microdialysis studies showing that Acb dopamine release mainly occurs during the consummatory phase of feeding and not during the anticipatory phase (Sahr et al, 2008;Wilson et al, 1995). Notably, an activation of the MAcbSh neurons was detected in anticipation to the fourth HFD consumption event, similarly as found for the IF dopamine neurons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In control tests conducted before treatment with either saline or an ED schedule of D-amph, the maximal increase in DA efflux occurred during the first 5 min of the preparatory phase preceding sucrose drinking (preamph group + 45%, presaline group + 49%). A similar pattern of DA efflux also was observed previously only in the first 5 min of the preparatory phase of feeding behavior (Wilson et al, 1995). Together, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that preparatory aspects of feeding behaviors are preferentially associated with changes in DA metabolism and/or release in the NAc (Blackburn et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This mesocorticolimbic dopamine (DA) pathway plays a critical role in many aspects of reward, including motivational states triggered by natural incentive stimuli (eg, food, sex, and social interaction) or pharmacological stimuli that can maintain drug self-administration (Everitt et al, 1999;Koob et al, 1998;Wise, 1998). In vivo microdialysis studies in rats report increased DA efflux in the NAc during preparatory and consummatory phases of feeding and sexual behaviors (Phillips et al, 1993;Wilson et al, 1995;Fiorino et al, 1997;Ahn and Phillips, 1999). Furthermore, virtually all drugs of abuse increase DA transmission in the NAc, which partly mediates their rewarding effects (Koob et al, 1998;Wise, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, AP-5-treated rats, unlike LY293558-and SCH23390-treated rats, showed no evidence of any additional arousal induced by noncontingent sugar delivery. Indeed, the same low levels of nose-poking were maintained from sessions 2 to 3, which may reflect an inability to act on the arousing effects of elevated levels of dopamine following food delivery (Hernandez and Hoebel 1988;Schultz et al 1993Schultz et al , 1997Wilson et al 1995;Bassareo and Di Chiara 1999). In fact, AP-5 noticeably increased the latency to retrieve rewards (although the sugar was always eaten when found) and lowered the probability of nose-poking after reinforcer delivery, effects not observed after LY293558 or SCH23390 treatment.…”
Section: Learning and Memory 289mentioning
confidence: 93%