2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/aafd4d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doping dependence of the phase diagram in one-dimensional extended Hubbard model: a functional renormalization group study

Abstract: Using functional renormalization group method, we studied the phase diagram of the onedimensional extended Hubbard model at different dopings. At half filling, variety of states strongly compete with each other. These states include spin-density wave, charge-density wave, s-wave and p -wave superconductivity, phase separation, and an exotic bond-order wave. By doping, system favours superconductivity more than density waves. At 1/8 doping, a new area of extended s-wave superconductivity emerges between charge … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The instabilities and emergent excitations of EHM with repulsive U and attractive V have been investigated using a few theoretical approximations and small-cluster simulations [28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The consensus is that a spin-triplet superconducting (TS) instability is favored for an intermediate |V |, while a phase separation (PS) develops for stronger |V |s [31][32][33][34] In two dimensions, the triplet superconducting (SC) state is topologically non-trivial where the fractional excitation can emerge on the boundary [35][36][37][38][39]. However, quantum fluctuations are usually too strong in 1D such that interacting electrons in a Hubbard-type chain usually behave as a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid (TLL), contradicting with the mean-field and smallcluster predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instabilities and emergent excitations of EHM with repulsive U and attractive V have been investigated using a few theoretical approximations and small-cluster simulations [28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The consensus is that a spin-triplet superconducting (TS) instability is favored for an intermediate |V |, while a phase separation (PS) develops for stronger |V |s [31][32][33][34] In two dimensions, the triplet superconducting (SC) state is topologically non-trivial where the fractional excitation can emerge on the boundary [35][36][37][38][39]. However, quantum fluctuations are usually too strong in 1D such that interacting electrons in a Hubbard-type chain usually behave as a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid (TLL), contradicting with the mean-field and smallcluster predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A repulsive V can induce a charge density wave (CDW), and an attractive V was argued to favor spin-triplet superconductivity [28,29]. Already in 1D systems, a p-wave superconducting phase was predicted for repulsive U and attractive V in EHM [30][31][32][33]. Similar studies have been explored in 2D systems [34][35][36][37][38][39], using weak-coupling theory or with approximation in treating interaction effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%