2022
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler boosting the stochastic gravitational wave background

Abstract: One of the guaranteed features of the stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) is the presence of Doppler anisotropies induced by the motion of the detector with respect to the rest frame of the SGWB source. We point out that kinematic effects can be amplified if the SGWB is characterised by large tilts in its spectrum as a function of frequency, or by sizeable intrinsic anisotropies. Hence we examine the possibility to use Doppler effects as complementary probes of the SGWB frequency profil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detection of pixel-scale anisotropy could provide the first indication of a single inspiraling SMBHB system which could then be subjected to targeted followup using both PTA GW and electromagnetic observatories. A detection of large scale anisotropy could indicate an over-density of SMBHB systems in a cluster environment, or might point to an extrinsic effect (Chung et al 2022), such as the kinematic dipole observed with the cosmic microwave background (Planck Collaboration et al 2020) and predicted to be detectable with a GWB (Bertacca et al 2020;Chung et al 2022;Cusin & Tasinato 2022;Valbusa Dall'Armi et al 2022). If we live in a Universe where both astrophysical (e.g., from SMBHBs) and cosmological (e.g., from cosmic strings) GWBs are present, we can leverage our knowledge of the different expected spatial (and spectral) distribution of these processes to disentangle them in the PTA datasets (Ungarelli & Vecchio 2001;Mandic et al 2012;Parida et al 2016;Biscoveanu et al 2020;Martinovic et al 2021;Suresh et al 2021;Kaiser et al 2022).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detection of pixel-scale anisotropy could provide the first indication of a single inspiraling SMBHB system which could then be subjected to targeted followup using both PTA GW and electromagnetic observatories. A detection of large scale anisotropy could indicate an over-density of SMBHB systems in a cluster environment, or might point to an extrinsic effect (Chung et al 2022), such as the kinematic dipole observed with the cosmic microwave background (Planck Collaboration et al 2020) and predicted to be detectable with a GWB (Bertacca et al 2020;Chung et al 2022;Cusin & Tasinato 2022;Valbusa Dall'Armi et al 2022). If we live in a Universe where both astrophysical (e.g., from SMBHBs) and cosmological (e.g., from cosmic strings) GWBs are present, we can leverage our knowledge of the different expected spatial (and spectral) distribution of these processes to disentangle them in the PTA datasets (Ungarelli & Vecchio 2001;Mandic et al 2012;Parida et al 2016;Biscoveanu et al 2020;Martinovic et al 2021;Suresh et al 2021;Kaiser et al 2022).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detection of pixel-scale anisotropy could provide the first indication of a single inspiraling SMBHB system that could then be subjected to targeted follow-up using both PTA GW and electromagnetic observatories. A detection of large-scale anisotropy could indicate an overdensity of SMBHB systems in a cluster environment, or might point to an extrinsic effect (Chung et al 2022), such as the kinematic dipole observed with the cosmic microwave background (Planck Collaboration et al 2020) and predicted to be detectable with a GWB (Bertacca et al 2020;Chung et al 2022;Cusin & Tasinato 2022;Valbusa Dall'Armi et al 2022). If we live in a Universe where both astrophysical (e.g., from SMBHBs) and cosmological (e.g., from cosmic strings) GWBs are present, we can leverage our knowledge of the different expected spatial (and spectral) distribution of these processes to disentangle them in the PTA data sets (Ungarelli & Vecchio 2001;Mandic et al 2012;Parida et al 2016;Biscoveanu et al 2020;Martinovic et al 2021;Suresh et al 2021;Kaiser et al 2022).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 (We have included only the linear-order term here, since v sol ∼ 10 −3 in relativistic units. See [33] for a recent discussion of higher-order kinematic effects in the GWB.) As a simple, specific example, consider the GWB generated by inspiraling compact binaries.…”
Section: B the Kinematic Dipolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the intrinsic anisotropies, there are also extrinsic or kinematic anisotropies due to the peculiar motion of our GW detectors with respect to the rest frame of the GWB [20,23,[33][34][35]. Most notable of these is the Doppler enhancement of the GW intensity we observe from sources we are moving toward and the corresponding reduction in intensity from sources we are receding from.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%