2015
DOI: 10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20150223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler Prediction of Adverse Perinatal Outcome in Intrauterine Growth Restriction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study found that the maximum gestational age at which the delivery occurred was preterm (59%) and this agrees with BN Lakhkar who found that the preterm (51.7%) of the sample. The current study revealed that (66%) of neonates had admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and this agrees with Mahale N et al [7] found it 27.24 years. BN Lakhkar who found that 35 babies were admitted into neonatal intensive care unit for treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study found that the maximum gestational age at which the delivery occurred was preterm (59%) and this agrees with BN Lakhkar who found that the preterm (51.7%) of the sample. The current study revealed that (66%) of neonates had admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and this agrees with Mahale N et al [7] found it 27.24 years. BN Lakhkar who found that 35 babies were admitted into neonatal intensive care unit for treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…One patient had normal Doppler parameters but still there was neonatal death. [8] Mahale N et al [7] found that adverse effect was LSCS (44%), admission to the neonatal care unit (76%), APGAR score <7 (47%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 For this reason, several authors have suggested that CPR could be a better index for predicting adverse outcome in FGR than either UA or MCA Doppler studies alone and that among pregnancies complicated by FGR, low values of this ratio are statistically associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcome. [30][31][32][33][34][35] These results agree with that of the current study where adverse neonatal outcomes are present in 26.4% in FGR group with the lowest CPR ratio and in 5.8% in SGA group in which CPR ratio was significantly lower than AGA group. In this study, CPR below 1.25 had a sensitivity and specificity of 81 and 91.2%, respectively, for prediction of adverse neonatal outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Near term when umbilical artery Doppler findings maybe subtler, decrease in middle cerebral artery Doppler index or the cerebroplacental ratio increases the suspicion for foetal growth restriction, even if the umbilical artery blood flow resistance index remains within the normal range. 8 Measurements of the cerebroplacental ratio are affected by the indices used in calculation and a standardised approach with gestational references ranges rather than single cut-off values should be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%