2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
160
1
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
10
160
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of dose was comparable between the two doses, with a standard deviation of 2 Gy for DICRU vs 1.9 Gy for D 2cc ; evaluated for the individual fractions. Two studies have reported a good correlation between D 2cc and DICRU of bladder (Kirisits et al, 2005). However, prior to our study, there were also two studies which observed significant difference between the two doses (Pelloski et al, 2005;Kim et al, 2007).…”
Section: 5259 Ct Based 3-d Treatment Planning Of Brachytherapy For Csupporting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variation of dose was comparable between the two doses, with a standard deviation of 2 Gy for DICRU vs 1.9 Gy for D 2cc ; evaluated for the individual fractions. Two studies have reported a good correlation between D 2cc and DICRU of bladder (Kirisits et al, 2005). However, prior to our study, there were also two studies which observed significant difference between the two doses (Pelloski et al, 2005;Kim et al, 2007).…”
Section: 5259 Ct Based 3-d Treatment Planning Of Brachytherapy For Csupporting
confidence: 43%
“…However, these points are not the best surrogates. Many studies have reported inconsistencies between these points compared with volumetric image-based 3D dose calculation and they cannot be the best estimate to predict late complication to organs at risk (Ling et al, 1987;Schoeppel et al, 1993;Barillot et al, 1994;van der Bergh et al, 1998;Fellner et al, 2001;Jason et al, 2003;Kirisits et al, 2005;Pelloski et al, 2005;Tan et al, 2009;Vinod et al, 2011). Imagebased brachytherapy allows more conformal treatment, integrating the concepts of anatomy, tumour features, and tumour response with time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are expected to be representative of the scenario where a ring applicator is used to mimic a tandem and ovoid geometry, and agree well with a similar study that showed <3% variation in dose to points A/B, bladder, and rectum. ( 6 ) The dosimetric discrepancies could be larger for nonconventional plans that are more conformal, ( 12 13 ) particularly if anterior or posterior dwell positions are used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dose per fraction was calculated using a biologically equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) and linear‐quadratic model with α/β=10Gy for CTVs and α/β=3Gy for OARs (2) . GEC‐ESTRO guidelines for contouring and dose constrains on normal tissues and CTVs were observed in treatment planning 12 , 13 , 14 . The treatment aim was to deliver a minimum total dose of 80‐90 Gy to D90 of the CTVHR (EQD2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%