2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(00)00286-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose constraints to the individual annual doses of exposed workers in the medical sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the same years, doses in our sample were higher than estimates of effective doses for general medical workers worldwide (mean, 0.7 mSv in 2000-2002) (19) and in the U.S. (mean, 0.74 mSv in 2003 and 0.75 mSv in 2006) (22) and were higher than the effective doses estimated in the U.S. Radiologic Technologists Study (21). Annual doses in our U.S. sample were consistent with published values of effective doses for NM technologists in other countries (19), including Bosnia and Herzegovina (12), Portugal (13), Lithuania (14), Greece (15), and Costa Rica (16), which generally ranged from 1.5 to 3.5 mSv.…”
Section: Badge Dose Readingsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the same years, doses in our sample were higher than estimates of effective doses for general medical workers worldwide (mean, 0.7 mSv in 2000-2002) (19) and in the U.S. (mean, 0.74 mSv in 2003 and 0.75 mSv in 2006) (22) and were higher than the effective doses estimated in the U.S. Radiologic Technologists Study (21). Annual doses in our U.S. sample were consistent with published values of effective doses for NM technologists in other countries (19), including Bosnia and Herzegovina (12), Portugal (13), Lithuania (14), Greece (15), and Costa Rica (16), which generally ranged from 1.5 to 3.5 mSv.…”
Section: Badge Dose Readingsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In total, nine institutions agreed to participate and provided the requested information by the requested deadline. The most common reasons given for not being able to supply information were the unavailability of clerical resources to identify the NM (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). Much of this evidence was summarized by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation report, entitled Global Survey of Occupational Radiation Exposures (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One exception is Greece, which introduced fixed dose constraints for the medical sector in 2005, including the different occupational groups and various departments (Kamenopoulou et al, 2001). For all workers in departments of nuclear medicine and radiology in Greece, the dose constraint was set at 2 mSv/year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A exposição de cada profissional difere, devido, principalmente, ao tempo dedicado à atividade e à distância relativamente ao paciente no momento da execução do procedimento (6) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified