2022
DOI: 10.1002/jez.2587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose‐dependent alkaloid sequestration and N‐methylation of decahydroquinoline in poison frogs

Abstract: Sequestration of chemical defenses from dietary sources is dependent on the availability of compounds in the environment and the mechanism of sequestration. Previous experiments have shown that sequestration efficiency varies among alkaloids in poison frogs, but little is known about the underlying mechanism. The aim of this study was to quantify the extent to which alkaloid sequestration and modification are dependent on alkaloid availability and/or sequestration mechanism. To do this, we administered differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that while alkaloids have been detected in frog skin as soon as 4–5 days after initial administration by LC-MS, , we did not observe an increase in normalized DHQ signal among alkaloid-fed individuals versus vehicle-fed individuals until day 10 during the feeding study. As alkaloid detection depends on the sensitivity of the mode of analysis and total quantities of accumulated DHQ in skin have been shown to increase with higher doses of the alkaloid, we expect that administration of a higher dose of DHQ would result in earlier detection of the alkaloid in vivo using the MasSpec Pen. It should also be noted that the efficiency of alkaloid accumulation differs among alkaloids; , thus, additional experiments are needed to determine the in vivo detection limit of the MasSpec Pen for various alkaloid compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that while alkaloids have been detected in frog skin as soon as 4–5 days after initial administration by LC-MS, , we did not observe an increase in normalized DHQ signal among alkaloid-fed individuals versus vehicle-fed individuals until day 10 during the feeding study. As alkaloid detection depends on the sensitivity of the mode of analysis and total quantities of accumulated DHQ in skin have been shown to increase with higher doses of the alkaloid, we expect that administration of a higher dose of DHQ would result in earlier detection of the alkaloid in vivo using the MasSpec Pen. It should also be noted that the efficiency of alkaloid accumulation differs among alkaloids; , thus, additional experiments are needed to determine the in vivo detection limit of the MasSpec Pen for various alkaloid compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As alkaloid detection depends on the sensitivity of the mode of analysis and total quantities of accumulated DHQ in skin have been shown to increase with higher doses of the alkaloid, we expect that administration of a higher dose of DHQ would result in earlier detection of the alkaloid in vivo using the MasSpec Pen. It should also be noted that the efficiency of alkaloid accumulation differs among alkaloids; , thus, additional experiments are needed to determine the in vivo detection limit of the MasSpec Pen for various alkaloid compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following collection in the field, we weighed all mother frogs to the nearest 0.1 mg using a Pesola PPS200 digital pocket scale and measured for snout-to-vent length (adults; SVL 19-22 mm) (Donnelly 1989b) to the nearest 0.1 mm using a Traceable® Digital Calipers. We euthanized mother frogs via freezing (Jeckel et al 2019(Jeckel et al , 2022, following which their skins were removed and stored in separate 4mL glass vials with Teflon-lined caps containing 2mL of 100% methanol. We weighed tadpoles to the nearest 0.1 mg using a Pesola PPS200 digital pocket scale, euthanized via freezing, and stored wholly in separate 4mL glass vials with Teflon-lined caps containing 2mL of 100% methanol.…”
Section: Study Site and Frog Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most organisms are able to biosynthesize defensive chemicals, whereas some must obtain them secondarily through a specialized diet of chemically defended prey items (Nishida 2002;Saporito et al 2012). The uptake, accumulation, and storage of secondarily derived defenses from diet is generally referred to as sequestration (Mebs 2001;Savitzky et al 2012;Jeckel et al 2022), and is a well-studied phenomenon among phytophagous arthropods (reviewed in Opitz and Muller 2009); however, sequestration has also evolved independently in several lineages of vertebrates (reviewed in Savitzky et al 2012) including snakes (Hutchinson et al 2007), amphibians (Daly et al 1994;Saporito et al 2009), and likely birds (Dumbacher et al 2004;Dumbacher et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of alkaloids derived from biogenic amines in Phyllobates vitattus (Protti-Sánchez et al 2019 ), they probably come from the biosynthesis of tryptophan as in bufonids (Scott Chilton et al 1979 ). In contrast, for most of the lipophilic alkaloids, a dietary intake of precursors that may or may not undergo metabolic transformations has been proven (Daly et al 2003 , 2009 ; Santos et al 2016 ; Jeckel et al 2022 ). Inter-individual variation among species, populations, and specimens probably depends on genetic/transcriptomic differences that delimit resistance to dietary toxins (Santos et al 2016 ; Tarvin et al 2016 ), different metabolic capabilities (Abderemane-Ali et al 2021 ; Márquez 2021 ), and the heterogeneous occurrence of dietary items on the forest in space and time (Saporito et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%