2008
DOI: 10.1897/07-149r.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose-related effects following oral exposure of 2,4-dinitrotoluene on the western fence lizard, Sceloporus occidentalis

Abstract: 2,4-dintitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) is an explosive frequently found in the soil of military installations. Because reptiles can be common on these sites, ecological risk assessments for compounds such as 2,4-DNT could be improved with toxicity data specific to reptiles. Western fence lizards, Sceloporus occidentalis, were used to develop a laboratory toxicity model for reptiles. A hierarchical approach was used; acute to subchronic studies were conducted to provide toxicity data relevant to short- and long-term exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rearing of western fence lizards continued for many years and contributed to a large portion of the acute toxicity data for reptiles (e.g., McFarland et al, 2008McFarland et al, , 2009Suski et al, 2008;Salice et al, 2009;Weir et al, 2015Weir et al, , 2016b. Throughout this period, there has been an effort to improve the dosing methods of fence lizards continuing the goal of a standardised toxicity test for reptiles (Suski et al, 2008;Salice et al, 2009;Weir et al, 2015). Specific methods have been developed for acute and chronic toxicity with reptiles (Suski et al, 2008;Salice et al, 2009) as well as oral dosing methods (Suski et al, 2008;Weir et al, 2015).…”
Section: Toxicity Testing On Reptilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rearing of western fence lizards continued for many years and contributed to a large portion of the acute toxicity data for reptiles (e.g., McFarland et al, 2008McFarland et al, , 2009Suski et al, 2008;Salice et al, 2009;Weir et al, 2015Weir et al, , 2016b. Throughout this period, there has been an effort to improve the dosing methods of fence lizards continuing the goal of a standardised toxicity test for reptiles (Suski et al, 2008;Salice et al, 2009;Weir et al, 2015). Specific methods have been developed for acute and chronic toxicity with reptiles (Suski et al, 2008;Salice et al, 2009) as well as oral dosing methods (Suski et al, 2008;Weir et al, 2015).…”
Section: Toxicity Testing On Reptilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard oral exposure methods for reptiles should be similar to those already in place for birds and mammals. These tests could be adapted to reptiles with special considerations for dosing that have been previously investigated (Suski et al, 2008;Weir et al, 2015). Development of either acute or chronic oral exposure tests for reptiles would require the availability of a model species and potentially optimising husbandry methods to create high turnover.…”
Section: Adapting Oral Avian Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4-Dinitrotoluene is an explosive chemical that is used in the production of the polyurethane foam for bedding and furniture industries and as a gelating agent in explosives, ammunition, and dyes 12 . The detection of DNT is important for a few reasons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has been described previously [8], [10]. Rather than intubate the lizards, repeatable and accurate dosing can be achieved with a micropipette and the technique is presumably less stressful for the animal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of the western fence lizard ( Sceloporus occidentalis ) as a vetted model organism for reptile ecotoxicity studies [7] has played a large role in increasing the availability of reptile toxicity data in recent years for metals [8], pesticides [9], and compounds of military importance [10], [11]. However, both estimates of exposure and estimates of toxicity are needed to conduct meaningful ERAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%