2011
DOI: 10.2478/v10019-010-0049-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric evaluation of a 320 detector row CT scanner unit

Abstract: BackgroundThe technologic improvements in Multislice scanners include the increment in the X-ray beam width. Some new CT scanners are equipped with a 320 detector row which allows a longitudinal coverage of 160 mm and a total of 640 slices for a single rotation. When such parameters are used the length of the traditional pencil chamber (10 cm) is no more appropriate to measure the standard weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIw) value.Materials and methods.Dosimetric measurements were performed on a 64… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CTDI vol is calculated based on a 10-cm pencil chamber and therefore SSDEs might not be applicable on these scanners. 20 In conclusion, a good correlation between body weight and effective diameter as well as BMI and effective diameter in adult chest and abdominal CT examinations was shown in the presented study. BMI demonstrated a significantly better correlation with D eff for abdominal CT, whereas weight showed a significantly better correlation in chest CT. On average, SSDE value per patient calculated with one of the two surrogate parameters for abdominal and chest CT, respectively, differed ,6% from those calculated with the reference standard.…”
Section: Khawaja Et Almentioning
confidence: 74%
“…CTDI vol is calculated based on a 10-cm pencil chamber and therefore SSDEs might not be applicable on these scanners. 20 In conclusion, a good correlation between body weight and effective diameter as well as BMI and effective diameter in adult chest and abdominal CT examinations was shown in the presented study. BMI demonstrated a significantly better correlation with D eff for abdominal CT, whereas weight showed a significantly better correlation in chest CT. On average, SSDE value per patient calculated with one of the two surrogate parameters for abdominal and chest CT, respectively, differed ,6% from those calculated with the reference standard.…”
Section: Khawaja Et Almentioning
confidence: 74%
“…5 Because the _ K 0Àw=oÀA and _ K 0ÀwÀA indicate only the primary radiation output detected by the ionization chamber, the dose gradient along the zaxis is not accommodated. 5 Because the _ K 0Àw=oÀA and _ K 0ÀwÀA indicate only the primary radiation output detected by the ionization chamber, the dose gradient along the zaxis is not accommodated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5 Because these measurements are carried out with little scattered radiation, they are utilized not only for the determination of _ K air , but also for characterization of the half-value layer (HVL) 6,7 and the bow tie filter profile. 2,5 Because these measurements are carried out with little scattered radiation, they are utilized not only for the determination of _ K air , but also for characterization of the half-value layer (HVL) 6,7 and the bow tie filter profile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation dosimetry is essential for quality assurance in diagnostic and therapeutic radiology 1,2. One of the most frequent tools for dosimetry are radiochromic films (RCF) because (1) they have nearly a tissue equivalent base material, (2) their spatial resolution is high, (3) they have a minor energy and dose rate dependency, and (4) they do not require a darkroom and developing 35.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%