2012
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/20695672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric variations of target volumes and organs at risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the actual dose variability to the targets and organs at risk (OARs) during nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) intensitymodulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and to investigate the significance of replanning. Methods: 11 NPC patients were included in this study. Each patient had both a planning CT and weekly repeated CT. Simulated plans that were generated by using the same beam configurations mapped to the repeated CT represented the actual delivered doses to the target vo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was consistent with the study of Zhang et al, in which a planning CT and weekly repeat CT were scanned to study the actual dose variability of targets and OARs for 11 NPC patients during IMRT [21]. The average maximum doses represented by D1 for the brainstem and spinal cord were not significant different between planned and delivered doses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This was consistent with the study of Zhang et al, in which a planning CT and weekly repeat CT were scanned to study the actual dose variability of targets and OARs for 11 NPC patients during IMRT [21]. The average maximum doses represented by D1 for the brainstem and spinal cord were not significant different between planned and delivered doses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This was consistent with the results of the studies by Wang et al [6] and Zhang et al [11], but was contradictory to the results of a study by Hansen et al [10]. Although the dose coverage of the target volumes remained unchanged in the current study, the D max and D mean delivered to the spinal cord had increased significantly in the hybrid IMRT plan, if without adaptive replanning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For head and neck cancer including NPCs, however, considerable geometric changes can occur due to tumor shrinkage and weight loss, water and fat re-distribution, etc., throughout the course of IMRT (3)(4)(5). Therefore, additional efforts are needed to optimize the radiation dose delivered to the target volumes (TV) and organs at risk (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). In addition, a gradual volumetric loss and the shift of the center of mass of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) at several timepoints have been quantified with repeated imaging in previous studies (4,5,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%