The Dosimetry of Ionizing Radiation 1990
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-400403-0.50006-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology and Computerized Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,22 This might be because the common causes of failure (e.g., infection, presence of large bony defects, and malalignment) act as contraindications for revision arthroplasty. 2 Arthrodesis gives predictable results and reduced reoperation rates in failed TAR compared with revision TAR. 6,13,14,21 The successful fusion rate in these patients has been reported to be 74% to 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…14,22 This might be because the common causes of failure (e.g., infection, presence of large bony defects, and malalignment) act as contraindications for revision arthroplasty. 2 Arthrodesis gives predictable results and reduced reoperation rates in failed TAR compared with revision TAR. 6,13,14,21 The successful fusion rate in these patients has been reported to be 74% to 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The choice of procedure depends on the cause of failure, condition of adjacent joints and soft tissues, surgeon's experience, and informed discussion with the patient. 2,14 Currently, the most common procedure for managing failed TAR is arthrodesis. 14,22 This might be because the common causes of failure (e.g., infection, presence of large bony defects, and malalignment) act as contraindications for revision arthroplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Solid state thermoluminescent detectors [7], optically stimulated luminescent detectors [8,9], and semiconductor devices [10] can be an alternative to ionization chambers for dose measurements. Measurement of ESD in vivo during mammography examinations when detector is positioned on the skin surface of the patient is complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%