2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-frequency ground penetrating radar for measurement of ice thickness and water depth in rivers and canals: Development, verification and application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where h y ( ) is the flow depth at the location y. Equations ( 7), (8), and (9) are the main equations for estimating discharge and streamwise velocity distributions in both open and ice-covered flows, similar to the procedure given in Shen and Ackermann (1980), but consider the effect of α coefficient. The cross-sectional geometry, that is, the flow depth distribution can be obtained either by depth measurements through drilled holes on the cover along the cross-section or using the double-frequency ground-penetrating radar (Fu et al, 2018). Equation ( 7) can be used to calculate the total discharge with one measured unit-width discharge.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where h y ( ) is the flow depth at the location y. Equations ( 7), (8), and (9) are the main equations for estimating discharge and streamwise velocity distributions in both open and ice-covered flows, similar to the procedure given in Shen and Ackermann (1980), but consider the effect of α coefficient. The cross-sectional geometry, that is, the flow depth distribution can be obtained either by depth measurements through drilled holes on the cover along the cross-section or using the double-frequency ground-penetrating radar (Fu et al, 2018). Equation ( 7) can be used to calculate the total discharge with one measured unit-width discharge.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ice thickness is usually measured using contact and non-contact methods. Contact measurement methods include manual drilling, and the use of resistance heating wires and pressure sensors [10]. Although the above methods are accurate, they have shortcomings such as low efficiency, poor operational safety, poor mobility, etc., making it difficult to achieve continuous observation in the region with these approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of investigations have also used GPR to measure snow thickness [17][18][19], and this approach has also been applied to snowpack analysis to determine physical properties, measure liquid water content [20][21][22], estimate density [23][24][25], and determine snow water equivalent [26,27]. Applications of GPR to river [28][29][30], sea [31], and reservoir ice [32] have primarily focused on thickness measurements and the detection of floating or grounded ice conditions [33,34]. Because the dielectric permittivities of ice (ε = 3-4), freshwater (ε = 81), and sediment (ε = 5-40) contrast greatly with one another, GPR can be used to detect the ice-water and water-sediment interface via changes in electromagnetic (EM) signals when highfrequency waves penetrate through these boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%