1970
DOI: 10.3758/bf03331858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-intermittent reward scheduling and secondary-reinforcer strength: Discriminated escape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present studies support the indications noted by Davenport and his students (Davenport, 1970;Davenport & Eschenbrenner, 1970;Davenport & Lerner, 1968) that the logical possibility of a signaled or discriminated escape paradigm does have reality. Our studies have clearly demonstrated that animals are capable of performing differentially to a signal which precedes "relief" in contrast to a signal which precedes "nonrelief."…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present studies support the indications noted by Davenport and his students (Davenport, 1970;Davenport & Eschenbrenner, 1970;Davenport & Lerner, 1968) that the logical possibility of a signaled or discriminated escape paradigm does have reality. Our studies have clearly demonstrated that animals are capable of performing differentially to a signal which precedes "relief" in contrast to a signal which precedes "nonrelief."…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It seems reasonable to expect that Ss can learn to respond differentially to such a situation, but this paradigm has apparently received no experimental study until recently. Davenport and his students (Davenport, 1970;Davenport & Eschenbrenner, 1970;Davenport & Lerner, 1968) have used this paradigm and, although acquisition of a discrimination was not the primary interest in these studies, they report varying degrees of success in obtaining discriminative control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generality, as mentioned in the introduction, does not extend to the broad category of escape behavior. Operant studies of discriminative barpressing for shock escape have been reported (e.g., Davenport & Eschenbrenner, 1970), and Woods has shown that rats learn signaled escape in the swimway within 52-78 trials based on brightness cues (Woods, 1973). Also, many studies have used shock-escape, T-maze, discrimination procedures (e.g., Overton, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite common to show that a rat can discriminate between black and white runways on the basis of the correlation of reward or nonreward with runway colors (e_g., Bower, 1961). It is also possible to show that rats can form discriminations in escape paradigms; Woods (1973) has reported this for cold-water, runway escape and Davenport for shock produced barpress escape (Davenport & Eschenbrenner, 1970). In fact, Woods has emphasized the uniqueness or the general procedure in paradigm classicification and labeled this case "signaled escape."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paradigm, an exteroceptive signal informs the subject whether the escape response will result in "relief" from the aversive stimulation to which he is exposed. Evidence that this is a real paradigm for laboratory studies has been reported (Davenport, 1970;Davenport & Eschenbrenner, 1970;Davenport & Lerner, 1968;Woods, 1973b). To deal with these problems and to attempt to improve on the classification scheme and thus, possibly, clarify our thinking, it is proposed that Grant's third dimension be modified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%