2022
DOI: 10.3390/math10183332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-Loop PID-Type Neural Network Sliding Mode Control of an Uncertain Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Model Based on a Nonlinear High-Order Observer with Unknown Disturbance

Abstract: An unknown nonlinear disturbance seriously affects the trajectory tracking of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). Thus, it is critical to eliminate the influence of such disturbances on AUVs. To address this problem, this paper proposes a double-loop proportional–integral–differential (PID) neural network sliding mode control (DLNNSMC). First, a double-loop PID sliding mode surface is proposed, which has a faster convergence speed than other PID sliding mode surfaces. Second, a nonlinear high-order observer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the initial state of the robotic fish is defined as ξ = [0 0 π/2 8 5] T . The NMPC controller has a state variable dimension of n s = 5, a prediction horizon of N p = 10, a control horizon of N c = 3, and a sampling time of T = 0.05 s. The safety margin between the robotic fish and obstacles is set at 0.3 m. The centroids of obstacles 1, 2, and 3 are located at coordinates (5,8), (2,5), and (5, 2) respectively, with each obstacle having a radius of 0.2 m.…”
Section: Validation Of Obstacle Avoidance Planning and Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, the initial state of the robotic fish is defined as ξ = [0 0 π/2 8 5] T . The NMPC controller has a state variable dimension of n s = 5, a prediction horizon of N p = 10, a control horizon of N c = 3, and a sampling time of T = 0.05 s. The safety margin between the robotic fish and obstacles is set at 0.3 m. The centroids of obstacles 1, 2, and 3 are located at coordinates (5,8), (2,5), and (5, 2) respectively, with each obstacle having a radius of 0.2 m.…”
Section: Validation Of Obstacle Avoidance Planning and Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to this point, the predominant techniques employed for trajectory tracking of underwater robots consist of traditional proportional integral derivative (PID) control [5,6], sliding mode control, fuzzy control [7,8], neural network control [9,10], intelligent control [11,12], and the pure pursuit (PP) method. The PID method, being a highly prevalent control strategy, has been extensively employed in the domain of underwater robot trajectory tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is about a PID controller that calculates the error value e(k) as the difference between the set depth value and the value received from the depth sensor and applies a correction based on proportional, integral and derivative terms (denoted P, I, and D, respectively). Hence the name [22,23]. The action of the PID controller is described by the following formula presented in the discrete form:…”
Section: Depth Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high-gain observer is employed for unknown internal and external disturbances, which is compensated for by output feedback control law [18]. An extended states observer is developed for system uncertainties in path-following control of under-actuated AUVs [19,20]. However, it may cause differential peak problems due to high gain, which affects control performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%