2013
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/104/67001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-tip piezoresponse force microscopy for quantitative measurement of the piezoelectric coefficient at the nanoscale

Abstract: Since the rotational symmetry of an electric field induced by piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) can be broken and tuned by a scanning probe microscope (SPM) using multiple tips, a double-tip PFM measurement method is proposed to quantitatively determine the piezoelectric coefficient d33 at the nanoscale, realized by modulating the spacing or voltage ratio between two SPM tips. Compared to the traditional PFM using a single SPM tip, the piezoelectric coefficient measured by the double-tip method agrees much … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used spatially resolved PFM to measure the piezoelectric constant. Steps toward quantification of d from PFM have been reported using different approaches, including low-frequency measurements far away from contact resonance frequencies and the use of static sensitivity or background removal, calibration on domain walls, , specialized cantilevers, , and interferometric approaches that complement PFM measurements on top electrodes. Other recent work includes the modeling of the cantilever beam shape and the introduction of a correction factor to compare cantilevers of different stiffnesses for PFM performed near or at the contact resonance frequency. , It is not only important to quantify the surface displacement but also to consider the non-piezoelectric PFM contrast mechanism including cross-talk, , electrostatic forces between cantilever and sample, Joule heating, , charge injection, and ionic motion …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used spatially resolved PFM to measure the piezoelectric constant. Steps toward quantification of d from PFM have been reported using different approaches, including low-frequency measurements far away from contact resonance frequencies and the use of static sensitivity or background removal, calibration on domain walls, , specialized cantilevers, , and interferometric approaches that complement PFM measurements on top electrodes. Other recent work includes the modeling of the cantilever beam shape and the introduction of a correction factor to compare cantilevers of different stiffnesses for PFM performed near or at the contact resonance frequency. , It is not only important to quantify the surface displacement but also to consider the non-piezoelectric PFM contrast mechanism including cross-talk, , electrostatic forces between cantilever and sample, Joule heating, , charge injection, and ionic motion …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steps toward quantification of d through SPMbased techniques have been reported using different approaches. Most of them include low frequency measurements far away from contact resonance frequencies and the use of static sensitivity or background removal [27] or even double tip approaches [28]. Recently, interferometric approaches have been described which complimented PFM measurements on top electrodes [29] or even replaced PFM [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%